Lobbying on Technical elements of the definitions set out in the Benchmark Regulation | OpenLobby.EU

Technical elements of the definitions set out in the Benchmark Regulation

Banking and financial services

Links

Public consultation

ID: 1122

Lobbying Activity

5 responses

Consultation response

London Stock Exchange Group, 20 Jul 2017

London Stock Exchange Group (“LSEG”) and FTSE Russell support the work on the Level 2 of the Benchmarks Regulation (“BMR”), a key piece of legislation which will ensure the integrity and robustness of benchmarks. We welcome the four European Commission delegated acts published in June. We would…

Consultation response

AMUNDI AM, 19 Jul 2017

Recital 4 introduces the concept of indirect use of benchmarks. We think that it is unnecessary for the effectiveness of the regulation and that it brings confusion. Article 1.2 refers to direct or indirect access to conclude that both have to be considered when assessing the availability to the…

Consultation response

European Fund and Asset Management Association, 20 Jul 2017

EFAMA would like to recall that the scope of the Benchmarks Regulation clearly covers only those indices that are public or made available to the public and, thus, is a precise one not covering all future or existing indices offered and used in the financial markets. In that context, we welcome the…

Consultation response

PensionsEurope, 20 Jul 2017

PensionsEurope welcomes the draft Delegated Regulation specifying the definition of ‘making available to the public’ of indices under the Benchmarks Regulation. The wording of the draft Delegated Regulation will ensure that pension funds are not inadvertently regulated as administrators of…

Consultation response

Global Financial Markets Association, 20 Jul 2017

Please see the attached comment letter on behalf of GFMA, FIA, and ISDA.