OpenLobby.EU
Explore

Knauf Insulation

Knauf Insulation is one of the world's largest manufacturers of insulation products and solutions for energy efficiency in buildings.

Lobbying Activity

Knauf Insulation demands material neutrality in EU Advanced Materials Act

13 Jan 2026
Topic — The EU is developing measures to strengthen production capacities and competitiveness for advanced materials.
Message — Knauf requests a level playing field where all construction materials receive equal treatment without artificial advantages. They urge policymakers to focus on scientific criteria and remove barriers to existing recycling solutions.12
Why — Regulatory neutrality helps them maintain their market position against new, potentially subsidized materials.3
Impact — Developers of novel bio-based materials may lose targeted financial support required to achieve market scale.4
Read full response

Knauf Insulation urges EU to end legislative barriers to recycling

6 Nov 2025
Topic — The European Commission is consulting on a new legislative framework for circularity.
Message — The company requests a unified EU waste market to eliminate fragmented regulations. They advocate for higher landfill prices and simplified rules for cross-border waste shipments.123
Why — Regulatory changes would ensure their multi-million euro recycling plant investments become profitable.4
Impact — Operators of traditional waste disposal sites would see their cost advantage vanish.5
Read full response

Knauf Insulation urges harmonized EU building carbon calculation standards

30 Oct 2025
Topic — The consultation defines a framework for measuring life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from new buildings.
Message — Knauf requests a 'cradle to grave' approach for all emissions to ensure a holistic perspective. They advocate for prioritizing product-specific data and using the EN 15804 standard exclusively.12
Why — Harmonized standards protect the company’s competitiveness by preventing regulatory fragmentation across the Single Market.3
Impact — National governments lose the flexibility to omit specific emission stages from their local regulations.4
Read full response

Response to New European Bauhaus

15 Oct 2025

As a construction products manufacturer we provide materials for buildings that allow us to build a home for all of us. The New European Bauhaus mission to enhance sustainability, resilience, aesthetics, inclusivity, accessibility and affordability thus rings true to our own purpose: providing long-lasting, sustainable materials to advance the decarbonisation of the built environment. As the New European Bauhaus continues evolving in the changing policy landscape, we would like to encourage taking the attached outlined asks into consideration to ensure that the NEB contributes to achieving the goals of the European Affordable Housing Plan, the Circular Economy agenda, and the Clean Industrial Deal amongst others. A plethora of elements are levers helping to unlock the full potential for more sustainable neighbourhoods and the built environment, ranging from moving from linear to circular practices, advancing efforts on renovating the existing building stock or increasing nature in cities. While decarbonisation is closely connected with housing, there is also a clear link to the future competitiveness of the construction sector, when addressing shortages of strategic raw materials needed for construction. To be able to boost sustainability in the built environment, means taking into consideration aspects on material efficiency, circularity and affordability, just as much as security of supply. In order to provide a future-proof, durable and sustainable building stock, informed choices on materials used in the design and planning of buildings are crucial. To devise the objectives properly, several factors ought to be taken into consideration, ranging from a holistic perspective of the life-cycle emissions of a product, to sufficient supply of materials needed to alleviate the housing crisis, and the availability of low-carbon products. To keep pace with the EUs net zero ambition and support the EUs competitiveness, the workforce with the right skills is needed. In most Member States, the construction sector has been reporting labour shortages, which have increased in severity over the last years. In fact, labour shortages in construction are now nearly three times as high as observed a decade ago. For a sector, which represents 10% of the EUs GDP and 6.4% of total employment, bridging the skills gap is not only necessary to achieve decarbonisation targets and alleviate the housing crisis, but also to uphold the long-term competitiveness of the sector. The NEB can help set the right trends in motion to effectively alleviate and bridge the skills gap. The New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative has proven to be a pivotal driver in aligning the construction sector with the EUs ambitious climate neutrality goals for 2050. By promoting sustainability, inclusivity, and innovation, the NEB has laid the groundwork for a transformative shift in the built environment. However, as the initiative evolves, it is crucial to address the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead to ensure its continued success and alignment with broader EU objectives of the current mandate focused on alleviating the housing crisis and enhancing the competitiveness of our European industry. To fully realise the potential of the NEB, it is essential to prioritise sustainability in the built environment by fostering circular practices like recycling, accelerating the renovation rate, and integrating nature-based solutions (e.g. green roofs and walls) into urban planning. Addressing the critical issue of securing strategic raw materials, e.g. natural gypsum, will also be vital to support the construction sectors transition to low-carbon, energy-efficient solutions. Furthermore, informed, science-based decision-making on material selection, ought to be supported by frameworks like Level(s) and represent the whole life cycle of materials to. Combining these elements, will ensure that the NEB contributes to a truly sustainable and future-proof building stock.
Read full response

Meeting with Engin Eroglu (Member of the European Parliament)

14 Oct 2025 · Dekarbonisierung der Industrie, bezahlbarer Wohnraum

Knauf Group urges EU to prioritize renovation and deregulation

17 Sept 2025
Topic — EU strategy to support the construction supply sector and increase housing productivity.
Message — Knauf urges implementation of building directives and renovation of existing stock. They recommend streamlining approval for modular construction. They also demand material-neutral policies.12
Why — Avoiding plant-level environmental reporting reduces the company's administrative and operational costs.3
Impact — Biobased material producers lose competitive advantages if specific legislative supports are removed.4
Read full response

Knauf Insulation urges material neutrality in bioeconomy strategy

23 Jun 2025
Topic — The EU seeks a sustainable bioeconomy to boost circularity and competitiveness.
Message — Knauf Insulation requests that the EU maintains material neutrality for construction products. They advocate for assessments using established European standards like EN 15804.12
Why — This ensures their mineral products remain competitive against bio-based alternatives.3
Impact — Bio-based developers lose the competitive edge granted by specialized regulatory support.4
Read full response

Meeting with Hanna Anttilainen (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné), Laia Pinos Mataro (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné) and

17 Jun 2025 · Simplification agenda, Omnibus Packages; Clean Industrial Deal, Affordable Energy Action Plan

Response to European Affordable Housing Plan

4 Jun 2025

The perilous housing situation makes it necessary for a coordinated approach to housing that is affordable and energy efficient, with the EU supporting its Member States. Ultimately, access to affordable housing underpins not only social cohesion, but also economic growth and competitiveness. Knauf thus fully subscribes to policy action at European level on housing, supporting Member States and regions, as well as evaluating the potential of existing EU legislation with potential for streamlining. Buildings account for approximately 40% of the EUs energy consumption and 36% of its CO2 emissions. Given the age and quality of our building stock, along with affordability problems especially during the energy crisis affecting the most vulnerable segments of our societies, there is a clear link between housing affordability and energy efficiency. A long-term energy efficient and decarbonized building stock can bring a paradigm shift to citizens, empowering them and rendering housing affordable. Next to decarbonizing our building stock through energy efficient renovations, focusing on worst performing buildings and envelope first measures, it will be crucial to address the financing gap through both public and private financing means and unlock funding tools incentivising renovations to move from a push to a pull effect. Unlocking affordable loans will be key: Citizens struggle to access affordable private finance. Additionally, accessibility can be improved by rolling out one-stop-shops allowing both access to available financing tools, but also the necessary information and contact points. Moreover, affordability is also impacted by existing regulations, which sometimes lead to increased bureaucratic burden affecting not only price and competitiveness, but also affordability of housing. Lastly, the construction sector is innovating new solutions, which could significantly help with the affordability crises across Europe by e.g. addressing accurate calibrations of EPCs via measured performance tools, increasing the pace and solving the labor shortage of renovation through pre-fabrication and alleviating stress in urban environments through light-weight top-up construction. Further details and recommendations for the European Affordable Housing Plan are available in the attached position paper.
Read full response

Meeting with Philippe Moseley (Cabinet of Commissioner Dan Jørgensen)

26 May 2025 · Housing

Meeting with Sebastião Bugalho (Member of the European Parliament)

19 May 2025 · Future of housing

Meeting with Irene Tinagli (Member of the European Parliament, Committee chair)

13 May 2025 · Introductory meeting

Meeting with Markus Ferber (Member of the European Parliament)

13 May 2025 · EU Housing policy

Meeting with Gelu Calacean (Cabinet of President Ursula von der Leyen)

13 May 2025 · Exchange of views on housing and renovation

Meeting with Gabriele Bischoff (Member of the European Parliament) and Efficient Buildings Europe and VELUX A/S (VELUX Group)

9 Apr 2025 · Housing

Meeting with Pascal Arimont (Member of the European Parliament)

21 Mar 2025 · Company visit

Meeting with Barbara Bonvissuto (Director Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs) and BASF SE and

19 Feb 2025 · Exchange on Housing and Efficient buildings initiatives in Europe

Meeting with Bruno Tobback (Member of the European Parliament)

13 Jan 2025 · Real Energy Performance and Energy Performance of Buildings

Meeting with Eero Heinäluoma (Member of the European Parliament)

12 Dec 2024 · Energy issues

Meeting with Marcos Ros Sempere (Member of the European Parliament)

11 Dec 2024 · Meeting with Knauff Insulation

Meeting with Yvan Verougstraete (Member of the European Parliament)

4 Dec 2024 · Energy efficiency

Meeting with Angelika Winzig (Member of the European Parliament)

19 Nov 2024 · Meeting with a representative of Knauf Insulation

Meeting with Bruno Gonçalves (Member of the European Parliament) and Platform for Electromobility

3 Sept 2024 · ITRE policies

Meeting with Andreas Glück (Member of the European Parliament)

4 Jul 2024 · Climate and Energy Policy

Meeting with Seán Kelly (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur)

5 Jul 2023 · EPBD

Meeting with Diederik Samsom (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Frans Timmermans)

7 Jun 2023 · RepowerEU, Farm to Fork and Hydrogen

Response to Action plan on accelerating Heat Pump market and deployment

26 May 2023

The decarbonisation of the building stock requires the roll out of energy efficiency solutions combined with electrification solutions, such as heat pumps. RePowerEU supports a faster uptake of individual heat pumps in buildings and of large heat pumps in district heating and cooling networks. The European Union aim at doubling the current deployment rate of individual heat pumps, resulting in a cumulative 10 million units over the next 5 years. The effective roll out of heat pumps can be slowed down if the regulatory framework (subsidies, policies) and market mechanisms are not properly addressed. The future action plan to accelerate the roll-out of heat pumps across the EU is one of a kind opportunity to provide a stable, sustainable and viable framework for shifting to renewable and efficient heating and cooling in buildings. Yet, there are a number of energy trends that will result in big challenges in balancing the grid: The shift to renewable energy means that our power supplies will become more intermittent and be unable to scale up in response to demand. The shift of residential heating to heat pumps means that electricity demand will be higher overall, higher at peak times each day, and there will be a new winter peak because electricity demand is much higher in winter than in summer. This results in two grid-balancing challenges: Winter Peak Challenge: There will be a new winter peak caused by the conversion of domestic heating to electrically powered heat pump heating. Daily Peak Challenge: The existing daily peaks in electricity consumption may be made much larger by heat pumps. With electrified (heat pump) heating and electric vehicles, there will be increased demand for electricity. If we shift all domestic heating to heat pumps, and all cars to electric vehicles, electricity demand in the EU would increase from 2640 TWh/year to 3808 TWh/year. However, winter peak electricity demand will increase from 9146 GWh/day to 15849 GWh/day. In a renewable grid, the amount of generation must be enough to meet this winter peak meaning that generation will be higher than needed during the rest of the year. This means that total required generation is higher than the total demand. With the existing building stock we must have generation capacity of 6267 TWh/year, 1.6x higher than the demand of 3808 TWh/year. Energy efficiency renovation can help to reduce this: o If demonstrated renovation measures reduce overall heat demand by 36% (i.e., tools exist to demonstrate that), we reduce electricity demand by heat pumps by 341 TWh/year. o However, because this reduces the winter peak demand - this reduces the total generation required from 6267 TWh/year to 5109 TWh/year a generation saving of 1159 TWh/year. o This generation saving is 3.4x higher than the demand saving every 1 kWh of demand saved results in a 3.4 kWh generation saving. The completion of a stable, sustainable and viable framework for heat pumps can truly be unlocked in the long-run by realising the twin association of renovation efforts and heat pumps roll out. Knauf Insulation proposes to establish a mechanism that facilitates the identification of buildings that are on track for transitioning to heat pumps and putting in place a policy and subsidy framework that allows for the combination of both measures to achieve the decarbonisation of the building stock in line with the objectives of the Green Deal. *These figures assume both that residential heating is converted to heat pumps, and that existing vehicles become electric cars that can be used to actively balance the grid at times of highest demand. ** The figures are coming from Knauf Insulation on the basis of data aggregated in various retrofit programmes and research publications.
Read full response

Meeting with Iskra Mihaylova (Member of the European Parliament) and Schneider Electric

4 May 2023 · discussion on Energy Performance of Buildings Directive

Meeting with Virginie Joron (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur for opinion)

25 Apr 2023 · Visite d'usine de recyclage de polystyrène

Meeting with Ciarán Cuffe (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur) and Stichting European Climate Foundation and

7 Feb 2023 · EPBD

Meeting with Peter Liese (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur for opinion)

24 Aug 2022 · REPowerEu

Response to Review of the Construction Products Regulation

8 Jul 2022

Please find Knauf Insulation feedback in a document attached.
Read full response

Response to Revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive 2010/31/EU

21 Feb 2022

The proposed revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) is an opportunity to drive the post-pandemic growth, upscale climate action and improve living conditions for millions – as the Renovation Wave strategic communication states it . The proposed provisions of the EPBD send a strong signal to the construction market: it paves the way for a long term and sustained decarbonisation of the EU building stock through energy performance requirements. Yet, the revision is a once in a decade opportunity to secure a well performing building envelope and delivering better buildings that are more sustainable, comfortable, healthy, and safe future-proof buildings. Knauf Insulation formulates recommendations in 4 areas to deliver a game-changer EPBD: 1. To set best-in-class standards for new buildings and introduce “energy needs for heating and cooling” parameter to secure a well-performing building envelope; 2. To create an enabling environment to stage and strengthen the renovation efforts; 3. To fully integrate co-benefits of energy renovation for better buildings; 4. To ensure an EU-wide harmonised approach to carbon metrics. Detailed policy suggestions on each of those key areas are shared in a document attached.
Read full response

Response to Waste Framework review to reduce waste and the environmental impact of waste management

18 Feb 2022

Knauf Insulation has more than 40 years of experience in the insulation industry and is one of the fastest growing and most respected names in insulation worldwide. We are committed to help our customers to meet the increasing demand for energy efficiency and sustainability in new and existing homes, non-residential buildings and industrial applications. Knauf Insulation takes the opportunity of the European Commission consultation to make two considerations for the revision of the Waste Framework Directive. Our objective ? To ensure an enabling circular economy framework for the mineral wool industry, that contributes to the decarbonisation of the building stock. Please find our feedback attached. We remain at the disposal of the European Commission for any further discussion. Quentin Galland, on behalf of Knauf Insulation
Read full response

Meeting with Morten Petersen (Member of the European Parliament)

15 Dec 2021 · Fit for 55 Package

Meeting with Stefano Grassi (Cabinet of Commissioner Kadri Simson) and Transport and Environment (European Federation for Transport and Environment) and

2 Dec 2021 · EPBD - Energy efficiency - Minimum Energy Performance Standards

Response to Revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive 2010/31/EU

19 Mar 2021

Knauf Insulation supports Option 3 – revision of the EPBD as a pre-condition to meet the objectives of EU Renovation Wave in combination with reinforced non-regulatory instruments such as technical assistance and project finance (Option 2). To that end, we propose the revision of the EPBD to include the following improvements: 1. Moving from paying for measures to paying for performance will ensure that EU Renovation Wave delivers what it has promised, pushes down costs for consumers and ensures a known return on investment. To do this, two things will be necessary: • Energy efficiency metering based on real performance needs to be allowed to act alongside or as an alternative to the Energy Performance Certificates (EPC). An alternative solution would be to allow MSs to create their own approach to authorizing such technologies to run alongside the EPCs, but taking into account that only EU certified energy performance metering technology can be used. • As announced in the Renovation Wave, the EU will need to develop a certification approach for energy efficiency meters, so that Member States (MSs) can use them and trust them. 2. Real energy performance will support a successful rollout of minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) for existing buildings. It is vital that MEPS deliver the exact energy savings that the EU needs to reach a highly energy-efficient and decarbonized building stock. 3. Introduction of a deep renovation standard should be combined with a system to improve the attractiveness of deep energy efficiency renovation. Currently pay back periods of a deep renovation are very long (15-20 years and upwards) and targeted subsidies for deep renovation are not common practice across MS. EU grants combined with private finance should hence target reducing paybacks of deep renovation to below 10 years in all MSs. 4. The EPBD should remain focused on delivering the Energy Efficiency First. This means increased efforts to improve energy performance and creating a more resilient building envelope to reduce energy demand of buildings in line with ‘Fit for 55%’ target. A possible approach to opening up the EPBD to address the embodied carbon of buildings should reflect that the most impactful origin of GHG emissions needs to be tackled first. For new constructions, embodied carbon should gradually be assessed and regulated (targets), starting with public buildings, offices and then housing. Whereas the methodology of assessing embodied carbon should be defined at EU level, the targets to be achieved should be set at national level. For renovations, the whole life carbon assessment should be initiated by pilot projects on major renovations starting with public buildings. The Level(s) framework, which includes operational and embodied carbon, should be the basis for such approach, as it proposes robust and harmonized methodologies. 5. By factoring green infrastructure (green roofs and walls) in the EPBD, the Commission can add multiple positive benefits of the Renovation Wave, in particular: boosting well-being, air quality, urban biodiversity and improved storm-water management. To make it happen, the EPBD should set out provisions on integrating green roofs and walls into all types of buildings. For new buildings, the implementation of green infrastructure should be mandatory in the design phase. For renovations, the EPBD should give a clear signal for installing green roofs and walls, especially when it comes to public and commercial buildings. Attractive incentives should be made accessible to investors, including in the residential sector, for which green surfaces should be prescribed, especially when undertaking major renovations. The implementation of urban green infrastructure should be supported with green infrastructure certificates defined at EU level, specifying real performance of green infrastructure using specific criteria, such as storm-water retention capacity and detention rates.
Read full response

Response to Review of Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency

21 Sept 2020

Under the European Green Deal, the European Commission has committed to stronger action on climate change. The current proposal to increase the 2030 target for greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) reduction to at least 55% requires dramatic stepping-up of efforts to improve energy efficiency levels. Revising the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) would be a golden opportunity and the necessary step to raise the energy efficiency ambition and to operationalise the Energy Efficiency First principle into regulation. To that end, we propose the revision of the EED to include the following improvements: 1. Firstly, the Energy Efficiency First principle must be central in the efforts to increase the EU’s GHG reduction target for 2030, and as such should be referenced in the EED. This means that the EU’s 2030 energy efficiency target must be increased to tap into the cost-effective potential of at least 40%. It should be expressed in both primary and final energy, and complemented by a clear indication of the contribution expected from building renovation. As progress in achieving the 2020 targets has slowed down, in part due to insufficient measures implemented at the national level, national binding energy efficiency targets need to be introduced to overcome similar issues for the 2030 target. 2. Thanks to digital innovation energy efficiency can now be measured the same way as energy generation. This means that governments and the markets can gradually move from supporting measures with no real understanding of the savings delivered, to instead investing in real performance outcomes. We propose that : - Energy Efficiency Obligation Schemes should open up for real performance approaches by ensuring a fixed share of white certificates to be based on real performance metrics. This share should be increased over time and gradually move the entire market to pay for real savings approaches. This will solve the transparency and trust issues and ensure that market players are incentivized to drive down costs and drive up the quality of renovations. - The revised EED should introduce a new system based on real energy performance measurement, which will allow to pay for real energy savings, not for measures. The system could use experience of guaranteed feed-in tariffs for the production of renewable energy. This new mechanism could possibly take the form of an EU or national efficiency purchase agreements or a Feed-Out-Tariff. 3. The scope of Article 5 on public building renovation should be expanded. We consider the current approach of this article too restrictive to have the necessary impact, as it now only concerns a small proportion of the European building stock. We call on the Commission to include in its EED Impact Assessment the renovation potential of all buildings owned or occupied by central, regional, and local authorities. 4. Article 20 should be open for revision to develop together with the European Investment Bank, a European Renovation Fund. This fund should support social housing, school and hospital renovations but needs to also include a specific facility to unlock the deep energy efficiency renovation of private residential properties. A specific part of the grant financing should be allocated for the technical assistance elements of deep energy efficiency renovation projects (i.e. the costs of the one-stop-shops using real energy performance metrics). In addition, the use of ETS revenues for renovation should be assessed. 5. Finally, Art. 8 should be revised to further unlock the energy efficiency potential in industry. The implementation of recommendations stemming from energy audits should be made mandatory, especially for measures with a short pay-back period. There is still significant energy efficiency potential of industrial insulation representing around 37 Mt annual cost-effective CO2 savings, or around 4% of industry’s total annual CO2 emissions (EiiF, 2020).
Read full response

Response to Commission Communication – "Renovation wave" initiative for the building sector

5 Jun 2020

The Renovation Wave offers a once in a generation opportunity for Europe to deliver future-proof standards so that we are building in resilience and performance to our building stock. This is where the Renovation Wave can make a difference – ensuring that measures are designed so that buildings are renovated to perform as intended and meet the expectations of the purchaser and investor. Below we present priorities that must be included in the upcoming Renovation Wave initiative for it to succeed: 1) The EU and Member States should move their grant support programmes away from fictive savings towards measured real energy savings. At first, national schemes should open up parallel funding routes for real performance approaches and provide higher support levels for ‘real savings’. As technology and market uptake of real performance tools becomes ubiquitous, EU and national schemes should stop grants based on fictive savings and move the entire market to real performance and pay for real savings approaches. This will solve the trust issue and ensure that market players are incentivized to drive down costs and drive up the quality of renovations. 2) The attractiveness of a deep energy efficiency renovation needs to be improved. Currently pay back periods of a deep energy renovation are very long (15-20 years and upwards). At the same time renovation activities deliver substantial benefits to society that are not captured by the consumer including substantial tax revenues, carbon emission reductions, job creation, reduced energy system costs and more. All these societal benefits justify significant government support to individual consumers who accept to take the risk and hassle of a deep energy efficiency renovation but do not receive these societal benefits directly. To kickstart the process the European Commission should set up a finance facility with the European Investment Bank dedicated to building renovation that blends grant and finance with a stream for private residential renovation and should ensure that it is supported with enough grant elements to bring pay backs below 10 years. The grant finance element can and should diminish over time as companies bring down costs of deep energy efficiency renovations but to get the underlying demand in the market activated, a substantial support element will be needed. The finance facility should provide three elements in one: long term (circa ten year) and low cost (ideally 0%) finance; grant financing (enough to make projects pay back in less than 10 years). The EU should ensure that mortgages are available and are attractive both for the mortgage lenders and to the homeowner. The work of EeMAP (Energy Efficient Mortgage Action Plan) provides a clear view on what is needed to unlock the mortgage industry to support deep energy efficiency renovation. 3) There should be a specific grant finance for technical assistance delivered through one-stop-shops. Financing must be available to consumers by approved one-stop-shops but be structured to be off balance sheet so that there is no financial constraint to delivering significant levels of deep energy efficiency renovation. One-stop-shops would have to qualify to get access to funding, to guarantee quality and to ensure proper monitoring. 4) A regulatory element is necessary to prohibit the sale or rental of properties that do not comply with high levels of energy efficiency. A deadline (e.g. 2030) should be set, after which it should be prohibited to sell or rent a property that does not meet strict energy efficiency levels across the EU. 5) Energy efficiency building renovation projects should be exempt from EU state aid rules. Funding for these projects is non-discriminatory and buildings are not actors on internal market. We observe that complex state aid procedures are sometimes a real barrier to implementation of building renovation projects in several MS. We will be happy to present more details of our proposals.
Read full response

Meeting with Miguel Arias Cañete (Commissioner) and European Insulation Manufacturers Association and

27 Sept 2016 · Energy efficiency in buildings

Meeting with Grzegorz Radziejewski (Cabinet of Vice-President Jyrki Katainen) and European Insulation Manufacturers Association and

30 May 2016 · energy efficiency in buildings

Meeting with Peter Van Kemseke (Cabinet of Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič)

25 Feb 2016 · energy efficiency initiatives and follow-up to the heating and cooling strategy

Meeting with Mathieu Fichter (Cabinet of Commissioner Corina Crețu)

17 Sept 2015 · Cohesion policy support to energy efficiency; energy efficiency and financial instruments

Meeting with Peter Van Kemseke (Cabinet of Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič)

23 Jun 2015 · The development of a policy framework in the field of energy efficiency of buildings in Europe.

Meeting with Eduard Hulicius (Cabinet of Commissioner Věra Jourová)

1 Dec 2014 · Product safety