Privacy International

PI

To promote the human right of privacy (as set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and subsequent United Nations conventions and declarations) throughout the world, specifically: (a) To raise awareness of, to conduct research about, and to provide educational materials regarding threats to personal privacy; (b) To monitor and report on surveillance methods and tactics employed against individuals and groups; (c) To work at national and international levels toward the provision of strong and effective privacy protections; (d) To monitor the nature, effectiveness and extent of measures to protect privacy, and to seek ways through information technology to protect personal information;

Lobbying Activity

Meeting with Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield (Member of the European Parliament)

5 Dec 2023 · Fundamental rights & EU surveillance transfers

Meeting with Nicola Danti (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur) and Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs and

27 Feb 2023 · Stakeholder consultation on the Cyber Resilience Act

Meeting with David Cormand (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur for opinion)

28 Sept 2022 · Ecodesign and Empowering consumers in the Green Transition

Meeting with Biljana Borzan (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur)

28 Sept 2022 · Empowering consumers for the green transition

Response to Digital Services Act package: ex ante regulatory instrument of very large online platforms acting as gatekeepers

12 Mar 2021

Privacy International (PI) welcomes the aim of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) to address some of the challenges posed by the way the current digital markets operate. However, we believe that the proposal put forward by the European Commission in December 2020 contains some shortcomings that need to be addressed, if the DMA were to be effective in tackling these challenges. While the DMA contains important positive elements, PI’s preliminary comments aim to address the current shortcomings of the proposal, notably: • The lack of focus on the rights and interests of end users (throughout the text); • The weak interoperability provision (Article 6(1)(f)); • Expand scope on updating obligations for gatekeepers (Article 10(2)(a)); • The lack of measures to address the negative effects of mergers (Article 12); • The need for transparency in profiling (Article 13); • The failure to include civil society in the implementation and monitoring of the DMA (Articles 15-17, 25-29 and others); • The need to assess DMA’s full conformity with the General Data Protection Regulation (Articles 1 and 6).
Read full response

Meeting with Andrus Ansip (Vice-President) and

1 Mar 2018 · Privacy Shield, GDPR implementation and e-Privacy