Unión de Empresas Siderúrgicas

UNESID

UNESID is the trade association representing the Spanish steel and primary steel transformation industry.

Lobbying Activity

Meeting with Nicolás González Casares (Member of the European Parliament)

19 Nov 2025 · Steel Trade

Meeting with Nicolás González Casares (Member of the European Parliament) and ArcelorMittal

1 Oct 2025 · Steel Industry

Spanish steel industry demands strict rules for foreign carbon prices

25 Sept 2025
Message — UNESID insists only explicit, verifiable, and net carbon costs be recognized. They demand that any rebates or fiscal compensations are fully deducted. Recognition must link directly to where the steel was melted.12
Why — These rules protect domestic producers from competitors using fake carbon cost claims.3
Impact — Foreign exporters using weak or indirect carbon pricing systems will face higher costs.4

Spanish steel industry urges tougher CBAM traceability and penalties

25 Sept 2025
Message — UNESID demands proof of where steel was melted and poured to ensure traceability. They call for systematic monitoring and penalties to prevent exporters from redirecting low-carbon products. Additionally, scrap must remain outside the scope to avoid artificial recycling costs.123
Why — These measures would protect domestic producers from unfair competition and market distortion.45
Impact — Non-EU exporters would lose the ability to use loopholes to hide carbon-intensive production.6

UNESID urges CBAM benchmarks to protect European steel recycling

25 Sept 2025
Message — UNESID demands benchmarks account for European recycling and indirect costs to ensure fair competition. They call for rules preventing exporters from dodging costs through minor product modifications.12
Why — This would protect European low-carbon producers against artificially cheap, high-emission imports.3
Impact — Foreign exporters using gas-based production would face significantly higher carbon fees.4

Spanish Steel Industry Urges Mandatory EU ETS Cost Compensation

5 Sept 2025
Message — The organization calls for compensation to be a mandatory, harmonized tool rather than a discretionary state-aid option. They demand separate eligibility for seamless steel tubes to prevent their high energy needs from being ignored. Additionally, the methodology must reflect how fossil fuel prices still influence renewable energy bidding.123
Why — These changes would ensure full financial protection against high power prices and maintain the industry's competitiveness.45
Impact — Public budgets face higher spending as member states would be forced to maximize industrial subsidies.6

UNESID Urges EU to Tax Imported Steel Components

8 Aug 2025
Message — UNESID proposes a new mechanism to stop quota circumvention. They also demand tariffs on processed steel products like metal furniture.123
Why — This would restore market protection and prevent customers from relocating production.45
Impact — European firms importing metal structures for renewable energy would face increased costs.67

Spanish steel industry urges EU content rules for decarbonisation

8 Jul 2025
Message — The industry calls for procurement rules that favor European low-carbon steel and mandatory labeling. They also request harmonized rules to prevent wealthier Member States from gaining unfair advantages.123
Why — These rules would protect Spain's efficient scrap-based steel industry from foreign competition.45
Impact — Non-EU manufacturers would be disadvantaged by the proposed local content and carbon footprint requirements.6

Meeting with Miguel Gil Tertre (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez), Thomas Auger (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez)

15 May 2025 · Competitiveness of the Steel Industry

Response to Delegated act on primarily used components under the Net-Zero Industry Act

20 Feb 2025

UNESID is the Spanish Steel Industry Association, representing the steel sector, including first transformation. Steel is the backbone of modern economies and is closely linked to numerous industrial sectors such as automotive, construction, mechanical goods, and defense. It is a key material for most net-zero emission technologies, as highlighted in the European Commissions list of specific components. However, while the current list is comprehensive, it could be further refined to include certain essential steel components and materials critical for net-zero technologies. UNESID welcomes the European Commissions initiative on NZIA secondary regulation regarding the list of key final products and components for net-zero technologies (Annex I). The current list, although comprehensive, does not cover some critical steel components, which limits NZIAs potential to fully support industrial resilience and strategic autonomy. You can find our contribution on the attached file. UNESIDs main proposals include adding mounting structures for solar technologies, non-grain oriented electrical steel (NGOES) for wind turbines and electric propulsion, and steel tubes and pipelines for hydrogen and carbon capture and storage (CCS) infrastructure. Additionally, we suggest broadening the definition of DRI reactors used in steel decarbonization to ensure all viable technologies are included. These improvements aim to enhance industrial resilience, secure supply chains, and strengthen Europe's leadership in clean technologies. By updating Annex I to better reflect the needs of the industry, the EU can foster innovation, reduce import dependency, and accelerate the transition to a sustainable and competitive low-carbon economy.
Read full response

Response to List of net-zero technology final products and their main specific components

20 Feb 2025

UNESID is the Spanish Steel Industry Association, representing the steel sector, including first transformation. Steel is the backbone of modern economies and is closely linked to numerous industrial sectors such as automotive, construction, mechanical goods, and defense. It is a key material for most net-zero emission technologies, as highlighted in the European Commissions list of specific components. However, while the current list is comprehensive, it could be further refined to include certain essential steel components and materials critical for net-zero technologies. UNESID welcomes the European Commissions initiative on NZIA secondary regulation regarding the list of key final products and components for net-zero technologies (Annex I). The current list, although comprehensive, does not cover some critical steel components, which limits NZIAs potential to fully support industrial resilience and strategic autonomy. You can find our contribution on the attached file. UNESIDs main proposals include adding mounting structures for solar technologies, non-grain oriented electrical steel (NGOES) for wind turbines and electric propulsion, and steel tubes and pipelines for hydrogen and carbon capture and storage (CCS) infrastructure. Additionally, we suggest broadening the definition of DRI reactors used in steel decarbonization to ensure all viable technologies are included. These improvements aim to enhance industrial resilience, secure supply chains, and strengthen Europe's leadership in clean technologies. By updating Annex I to better reflect the needs of the industry, the EU can foster innovation, reduce import dependency, and accelerate the transition to a sustainable and competitive low-carbon economy.
Read full response

Spanish steel industry urges public fund for historic CMR liability

23 Jan 2024
Message — UNESID proposes a public fund for historical chemical exposures in previously state-owned plants. They also suggest aligning reporting requirements with existing EU chemical laws. This would focus inspections on installations with the highest exposure levels.123
Why — This protects current owners from financial costs and legal uncertainty regarding past chemical exposures.45
Impact — Public administrations and taxpayers would bear the financial burden of compensating retired workers.67

Spanish steel industry urges strict verification of environmental claims

21 Jul 2023
Message — UNESID calls for mandatory third-party verification of environmental claims to ensure credibility. All products from non-EU countries must also demonstrate their environmental performance to maintain a level playing field. The directive should allow claims for products containing hazardous substances if they pose no risk.123
Why — This would protect high-standard European producers from unfair competition and distinguish them from greenwashers.45
Impact — Non-EU exporters and EU states with lower verification thresholds would lose their competitive advantage.6

UNESID seeks materiality focus in sustainability reporting standards

3 Jul 2023
Message — UNESID proposes deleting requirements to report information regardless of materiality assessment results. They suggest referencing the supply chain at a first stage rather than the value chain. They request a common definition to delimit what is understood as areas of water risk.123
Why — These changes would reduce the reporting burden and provide greater regulatory certainty for companies.45

Response to European Critical Raw Materials Act

30 Jun 2023

UNESID is the trade association of the Spanish steel Industry and the first tier of downstream activities. It gathers 46 companies that employ 50,000 people, in addition to more than 20,000 related to scrap recovery. Every tonne of steel produced in Spain carries out 7 in environmental investments. The Spanish steel industry is the recycling champion, as every year 11 m tonnes of ferrous scrap become new steel. The steel industry makes efficient use of resources to take advantage of almost 80% of the waste and by-products generated in the process; the water recirculation ratio is over 90%. The steel industry is the paradigm of the circular economy. UNESID welcomes this new initiative aimed to stablish a framework that ensures the Union's access to a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials: indeed, they are strategical for the ecological and digital transition wherein the steelmaking industry is a key sector. The Spanish steel industry also welcomes the efforts made by the proposed regulation to reduce dependence on unreliable or highly concentrated sources of metals, which reinforces both European strategic autonomy and the circular economy production model. We consider that, in general, the fields addressed by the act are appropriated, however, in some cases the scope should be improved to achieve the desired objectives. In particular we note and recommend the following general proposals as well as some specific amendments (see the attached file).
Read full response

Spanish steel sector demands faster permits and procurement reforms

22 Jun 2023
Message — UNESID demands faster permitting processes that cover the entire industrial value chain. They insist public buyers accept cost increases over ten percent for green products.12
Why — These changes would streamline industrial upgrades and secure higher-value public contracts.34
Impact — Taxpayers and public budgets would bear significantly higher costs for green infrastructure.5

Spanish steel association urges flexibility in emissions directive revision

22 Jun 2022
Message — UNESID calls for maximum flexibility in emission limits and decarbonisation plans to account for technological uncertainty. They advocate for protecting confidential business information in transformation plans and oppose merging multiple regulatory areas like health into a single system.123
Why — This approach protects their competitive advantage and avoids unachievable emission targets.456
Impact — Environmental regulators and transparency advocates face reduced access to detailed industrial data.7

Response to Evaluation and revision of the Weights and Dimensions Directive

17 Feb 2022

UNESID, representando a la industria siderúrgica y de primera transformación del acero apoya el aumento de la masa máxima de los camiones a 44 toneladas, así como el libre tránsito entre Estados Miembros de los vehículos de este tonelaje. Existen varias razones para ello: Por una parte, la eficiencia climática: cada viaje en el que se aumente la carga transportada de las aproximadamente 22t actuales en distintos EMs a 26t supone una reducción muy importante de CO2 y otros contaminantes (NOx, SO2, PM2,5…) por viaje. Conseguir esta reducción está al alcance de una pequeña reforma normativa. Dada la urgencia establecida en la UE por la reducción de emisiones, no podemos permitirnos el lujo de no usar medidas que, como esta, están al alcance de la mano. Adicionalmente se consigue una mayor eficiencia económica que debería beneficiar a todos los integrantes de la cadena logística. Por otra parte no podemos olvidar el daño que la fragmentación regulatoria actual hace al mercado interno de la Unión, tanto en el sector industrial como en el del transporte. Industrias exportadoras de España son menos competitivas que sus vecinas de Portugal o Francia que son capaces de llevar sus mercancías hasta los puertos para exportar en vehículos de 44t. En cuanto a las compañías de transporte internacional, prefieren lógicamente acabar sus destinos en Francia, donde pueden llegar con 44t, que entrar a España donde solo pueden llegar con 40t. Se disminuye por tanto la competencia del transporte en España. Desde el punto de vista de la subsidiariedad, la UE está legitimada para actuar promoviendo esta medida y evitando esta fragmentación del mercado interno. Entendemos que puedan existir posturas contrarias a priori, pero pierden fuerza dado el problema existente con la escasez de conductores. Además esta escasez no es un problema de corto plazo sino estructural, ya existente antes de la pandemia, y que se agrava con el paso del tiempo. Otras respuestas a esta consulta se oponen a la medida por problemas de seguridad y coste de mantenimiento de carreteras. Los argumentos al respecto son: - Seguridad. Las 44t ya están autorizadas en uso intermodal. Entendemos que no es así por la experiencia acumulada ya durante bastantes años en distintos países. Sectores específicos como el transporte de madera tienen autorizadas cifras incluso mayores. La Comisión tiene a su disposición, por tanto, la capacidad de recoger información que permita valorar si este aumento de la masa de los camiones genera problemas de seguridad vial. - Coste de mantenimiento de infraestructuras. El coste existe pero es muy inferior al beneficio ambiental conseguido, que se puede valorar con el precio actual de las emisiones de CO2. Por otra parte, dada la política actual de extender el pago por uso de las infraestructuras, este coste ya no recae sobre el conjunto de la sociedad. Los propios beneficiarios de la medida son los que pagan su coste. - Perjuicio al ferrocarril. Se teme que cualquier medida que favorezca el transporte por carretera vaya a perjudicar al ferrocarril, modo de transporte en el que hay muchas esperanzas depositadas para la descarbonización. Pero no se puede plantear una alternativa excluyente entre ambos modos: si el ferrocarril cobra impulso seguirá necesitando la colaboración de los camiones para conectar las terminales ferroviarias con los puntos de origen o destino. Además, con el desarrollo de las autopistas ferroviarias, llevar más carga en los camiones también supondrá llevar más carga en los vagones de tren.
Read full response

Response to Maximum dimensions and weights in national and international traffic for certain road vehicles circulating within Union

2 Feb 2022

UNESID, representando a la industria siderúrgica y de primera transformación del acero apoya el aumento de la masa máxima de los camiones a 44 toneladas, así como el libre tránsito entre Estados Miembros de los vehículos de este tonelaje. Cada viaje en el que se aumente la carga transportada de las aproximadamente 18t actuales en distintos EMs a 22t supone una reducción de CO2 y otros contaminantes (NOx, SO2, PM2,5…) del 18% por viaje. Conseguir esta reducción está al alcance de una pequeña reforma normativa. Dada la urgencia establecida en la UE por la reducción de emisiones, no podemos permitirnos el lujo de no usar medidas que, como esta, están al alcance de la mano. Adicionalmente se consigue una mayor eficiencia económica que debería beneficiar a todos los integrantes de la cadena logística. Entendemos que puedan existir posturas contrarias a priori, pero pierden fuerza dado el problema existente con la escasez de conductores. Además esta escasez no es un problema de corto plazo sino estructural, ya existente antes de la pandemia, y que se agrava con el paso del tiempo. Desde el punto de vista de la subsidiaridad, la UE está legitimada para actuar promoviendo esta medida ya que la situación actual, con los EM utilizando distintas medidas y sin poder transitar con 44t entre países, está creando una fragmentación del mercado interno de transporte por carretera. También genera diferencias artificiales de competitividad entre las industrias de los Estados Miembros. Otras respuestas a esta consulta se oponen a la medida por problemas de seguridad y coste de mantenimiento de carreteras. Los argumentos al respecto son: - Seguridad. Las 44t ya están autorizadas en uso intermodal. Entendemos que no es así por la experiencia acumulada ya durante bastantes años en distintos países. Sectores específicos como el transporte de madera tienen autorizadas cifras incluso mayores. La Comisión tiene a su disposición, por tanto, la capacidad de recoger información que permita valorar si este aumento de la masa de los camiones genera problemas de seguridad vial. - Coste de mantenimiento de infraestructuras. El coste existe pero es muy inferior al beneficio ambiental conseguido, que se puede valorar con el precio actual de las emisiones de CO2. Por otra parte, dada la política actual de extender el pago por uso de las infraestructuras, este coste ya no recae sobre el conjunto de la sociedad. Los propios beneficiarios de la medida son los que pagan su coste.
Read full response

Response to Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism

18 Nov 2021

UNESID, the Spanish Steelmaking and Steel transforming Association views in relation with the proposed Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) (Several other aspects has been/are going to be commented by Eurofer, the European Steelmaking Association, and the alliance of the Energy Intensive Industries) UNESID welcomes the Commission tying to reduce carbon leakage and a higher impact in climate change by a proposal which try to equalize carbon cost and therefore equalizing climate change competitiveness of some basic materials produce in Europe. Nevertheless there are so many grey or dark in key areas of the proposal (for further development in secondary legislation) that it is impossible to have a clear view of the practical functioning of the proposal. Our opinion just highlight those basic aspect that needs to be present to make the proposal working properly in the right direction. 1. It’s difficult to evaluate the CBAM. Too many key aspect to fall under secondary legislation. 2. Too many uncertainties. Prudence for implementing CBAM. It is needed to keep a high level of direct allocation, and (a harmonized EU wide) indirect compensation for electricity if it were eventually included, meanwhile. 3. CBAM should protect also the downstream processing intensive industries of the affected materials. 4. CBAM should set up a procedure for the material/product exports with lower emissions would not be penalised for over-cost in EU. 5. Notification/monitoring/ reporting and verification is key for a reliable CBAM. 6. Quick resolving procedure for disputes. 7. Collected funds from CBAM should support the industrial transition toward the decarbonisation of the affected sector. 8. There are many doors/risk for circumvention. Some examples here. (Herein below: further explanation in the attachment)
Read full response

Response to Updating the EU Emissions Trading System

8 Nov 2021

UNESID, the Spanish Steelmaking and Steel transforming Association views in relation with a future improvement of the EU Emission Trading Scheme Promoting the electrification, either direct or indirect instead of hamper it. (Several other aspects has been/are going to be commented by Eurofer, the European Steelmaking Association) Climate change and therefore decarbonizing the Economy is one of the most challenging problems future of the Human Kind. The future ETS should reinforce all the needed measures to reinforce the use of non-emitting or carbon net energy sources. Non emitting electricity either directly or through indirect energy carriers as Hydrogen or synthetic fuels being the most important ones Consequently, the European Union, and subsequently ETS should put its effort in those measures which facilitate an increasing electrification of the economy. Electricity consumption for energy intensive eligible sector as steelmaking should not bear any additional cost. EU should put a strong effort in reducing the non-emitting electricity price in all its components. Nevertheless, the reality of the electricity price is going exactly in the opposite direction due to a perverse scheme in the price setting. The low emitting electricity is unfairly profiting of CO2 which is not emitted, was not considered when carried out the investment, in many cases decades ago. Even more, it generate long time price signal for future expectations which makes rather complicate and slow down whatever effort to return to a reasonable price band. These extremely high and crazy electricity prices in the EU are not considered to be a short temporary situation but a structural one. It is changing the price reference to much higher level regardless it could decrease one or two steps back but far from a reasonable and incentivizing range for promoting investment and innovation either in direct electricity use or indirect H2 consumption. It is clearly hampering the desired electrification of the economy. The compensation scheme for the CO2 price overcharge to the electricity prices, for the eligible sectors within the ETS should fall apart from the State Aids, which implies it is applied in an un-harmomised way throughout EU scheme and without considering the Energy Efficiency of each plant, but depending on the available funding a political interest of each country. It should not be forgotten that the eligible sectors for indirect compensation are chosen due to its intensive electricity consumption and very high international competence due to its international trading intensity. Absurdly, just by being considered within the state aids schemes, it generate international trading issues under a miserly interpretation point of view. This interpretation has already happen in an anti-subsidy procedure from a country without relevant carbon cost against EU producers of several steel products. It is neither fair nor efficiency from the Environmental and Climatic point of view Spanish steelmaking, represented by UNESID, is currently among the most electrified steelmaking countries in Europe, and willing to work even for a further direct or indirect electrification. But, far from being a strategic advantage, the electricity (mis)consideration within the EU Emission Trading Scheme transmits the opposite signal. It needs an urgently correction in whatever future ETS revisions.
Read full response

Response to Sustainable Products Initiative

16 Nov 2020

The Spanish Steel Association, UNESID, in representation of the Spanish Steel Industry welcomes the opportunity to give feedback on the Inception Impact Assessment of the Sustainable Products Initiative. The European Green Deal has defined ambitious aspirations that will entail a converging point in the European economic system. We agree that for that, great effort shall be made both at public and private levels in terms of investment, innovation and, in essence, evolution. We believe, that circularity, carbon neutrality and addressing pollution (among others) should comprise the main fundamentals that would guide long-term decision-making processes. It is essential that initiatives to decouple economic growth from the increase of environmental impacts are homogeneously designed and applied. UNESID welcomes the Sustainable Product Initiative and asks for public and private effort that promotes environmentally friendly and socially respectful materials, design, innovation and investment.
Read full response

Spanish steel industry urges realistic pollution risk management

29 Oct 2020
Message — UNESID argues pollution management should focus on tolerable risk levels rather than zero levels. Risk minimization should be based on what is reasonably practicable rather than physically possible. They also call for harmonized rules to prevent unfair competition.123
Why — This approach prevents unfeasible technical requirements and protects industry competitiveness in global markets.45
Impact — Citizens and ecosystems may remain exposed to pollutants deemed practicable but not eliminated.6

Spanish steel industry demands role in pollution reporting review

26 Oct 2020
Message — UNESID demands the industrial sector is completely involved since the very beginning to ensure a reliable system. They request that confidential business information is anonymously shared and aggregated. They insist this must not replace existing processes for defining technical standards.123
Why — Protecting confidential business information avoids exposing sensitive industrial data to competitors or the public.4
Impact — Public transparency advocates lose access to specific facility data if information is anonymized and aggregated.5

Spanish steel industry seeks wastewater reuse for industrial cooling

8 Sept 2020
Message — UNESID recommends that the directive promote treated wastewater reuse for industrial cooling rather than just agriculture. The association argues that plant output quality must be adapted to meet specific industrial requirements.12
Why — This would allow steel producers to optimize their cooling processes using recycled water.3
Impact — Public authorities and treatment managers may face higher costs for upgrading infrastructure.4

Spanish steel industry urges practical chemical risk management

19 Jun 2020
Message — UNESID argues that chemical risks should be managed to rational levels instead of zero. They request specific evaluation protocols for metal alloys rather than generic chemical methodologies.12
Why — Adopting practical risk standards prevents the industry from facing impossible technical sacrifices.3
Impact — Environmental groups and citizens lose the protection of a strictly zero-pollution environment.4

Response to Climate change mitigation and adaptation taxonomy

27 Apr 2020

UNESID is the Spanish Steelmaking Association (see the entire set of comments in the attachment. 20200426 UNESID Taxonomia FINAL- CLEAN.pdf) Resume: Unesid agrees with the need of developing criteria to support sustainable financing and avoiding an often greenwashing behavior UNESID thinks that “green”/sustainable fund need to be focused on the promotion of sustainable investments rather that investing on sectors/companies considered as “green”/sustainable by default We provide some examples or criteria which better define what we consider as sustainable: - Pollution prevention and control: Emission reduction projects that aim to achieve emission levels below the thresholds defined by the Best Available Techniques for each sector. - Climate change: Investments through which a facility can be located within the most efficient complex in terms of direct and indirect GHG emissions (within the percentile 25) as per the EU ETS system. - Transition to a circular economy: Products which are manufactured using more than 50% of recycling material as raw materials (both coming from the same industrial sector or from other industrial activities). Latter we further explain some of the already specific criteria specific case of the steel industry for climate mitigation: UNESID highlight that the ETS benchmarking was not developed for the taxonomy of the investment but to allocate CO2 in a new created EU market. Average of the percentile 10% of all the installations represent the best 4% which is far too strict. For the recycling material for EAF steelmaking furnaces we thanks that they are considered as sustainable in using more than 90% of the iron content from scrap. Nevertheless this threshold need to be adjusted to allow the alloys steel, an particularly stainless steel to be fairly suitable to be consider as sustainable investment. Stainless Steel is one of the three developments with a greater improvement in the human life expectancy during the past century together with the antibiotics and the water treatment. In other to assess what the behaviour of activity is, it is important to consider what the LCA of such a material/process is, e.g. an increasing energy consumption in a certain step of the material production can induce much higher energy reductions further in the using phase. Nevertheless we acknowledge that LCA approach is complicated in practice. Meanwhile is important to consider the footprint (either carbon, environmental or water). It is difficult to assess the taxonomy approach as there is only information on its implication based on climate mitigation, adaptation and also about not significate harm any of the other aspects (water protection, circular economy, polluting prevention and ecosystem protection). Unesid thing that the agreement on criteria for supporting sustainable financing should be carried out internationally, preferable under ISO standards as investors are based everywhere.
Read full response

Response to A new Circular Economy Action Plan

20 Jan 2020

The Spanish Steel Industry welcomes the New Circular Economy Action Plan, which will help to continue working towards the circularity of the businesses and thus the economy. We believe that smart business models will be key for the promotion of a sustainable and solid industry. Nevertheless, these initiatives should eventually be deployed throughout an initial strong political commitment and afterwards through legislative developments which support a REAL evolution (not hampering it). Unfortunately, the current conceptualisation of the Circular Economy is closer to become a political slogan rather than a set of practical initiatives. Words are important. For this reasons from the Spanish steel sector we propose to change the pejorative use of wording as “secondary materials”, “secondary raw materials”, end of life materials, alternative materials should change to PRIORITY (raw) materials when talking about materials with comes from a previous life. This terminology would integrate the philosophy of the circular economy, by withdrawing the negative aspect of the current terminology. Such a terminology wants to offset that one commonly applied to the “first life” materials: “primary (raw) materials”, “natural materials”, “virgin materials”, etc. See attached more detailed feedback.
Read full response

Steel group UNESID seeks revised cobalt classification to protect recycling

8 Feb 2019
Message — UNESID requests maintaining a 0.1% cobalt threshold while refining methodologies for alloys. They argue the hazard classification should be limited specifically to the inhalation route. Finally, they urge the Commission to assign category 1B instead of 1A.123
Why — This prevents unfair reputational damage and the collapse of the European recycling sector.45
Impact — European recycling companies lose business as production shifts to third countries.6

Response to Amendment of the EU ETS Monitoring and Reporting Regulation (MRR)

26 Nov 2018

UNESID, the Spanish Steel Association would like to contribute to this consultation
Read full response

Meeting with Miguel Ceballos Baron (Cabinet of Vice-President Cecilia Malmström) and The European Steel Association

14 Jun 2016 · China and steel

Meeting with Miguel Ceballos Baron (Cabinet of Vice-President Cecilia Malmström), Miguel Ceballos Baron (Cabinet of Vice-President Cecilia Malmström) and The European Steel Association

9 Mar 2015 · Steel sector in China

Meeting with Maria Cristina Lobillo Borrero (Cabinet of Vice-President Miguel Arias Cañete)

22 Jan 2015 · 2030 energy and climate framework

Meeting with Miguel Arias Cañete (Commissioner) and

2 Dec 2014 · Market Stability Reserve and 2030 Framework