OpenLobby.EU
Explore

Interservice consultation on a Commission proposal for the GES Decision

Environment

Links

Public consultation

ID: 1036

Lobbying Activity

13 responses

Consultation response

WWF European Policy Programme, 11 Oct 2016

We would like to bring to your attention some fundamental improvements that are still needed to ensure that the revised Decision leads to a more effective implementation of the MSFD. We recognise that the proposed draft Decision is an improvement upon Decision 2010/477/EU by providing for a…

Consultation response

Stichting BirdLife Europe, 11 Oct 2016

We would like to bring to your attention some fundamental improvements that are still needed to ensure that the revised Decision leads to a more effective implementation of the MSFD. We recognise that the proposed draft Decision is an improvement upon Decision 2010/477/EU by providing for a…

Consultation response

International Association of Oil Gas Producers Europe, 12 Oct 2016

IOGP welcomes the opportunity for Oil and Gas operators to share their views on the draft amendment to MSFD Annex III and on the draft GES Decision. We welcome the clarification of the relationship between the Descriptors, the characteristics, the pressures and the impacts elements (Annex I and…

Consultation response

The Pew Charitable Trusts, 12 Oct 2016

Feedback part 2 of 2: 2) Descriptor 3 – Specifications and standardized methods for monitoring and assessment Descriptor 3, item 1(d): With respect to item 1(d), “The species under multiannual plans according to Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013”, Pew would like to reaffirm that…

Consultation response

Seas At Risk vzw, 11 Oct 2016

Please find again the link to our more detailed comments on the Decision and its Annex: http://seas-at-risk.org/images/pdf/Other_pdfs/NGO_comments_GES_decision_Oct2016.pdf (the link in our previous submission was cut short)

Consultation response

Energinet, 26 Sept 2016

It is of highest importance that regional and national different characteristics are taken into account when establishing the criteria, the methodological standards and standardized methods for monitoring and assessment. Otherwise unnecessary restrictive criteria leading to unnecessary high costs…

Consultation response

Cooperatie Kottervisserij Nederland (VisNed), 12 Oct 2016

We acknowledge the need to make Decision 2010/477/EU more clear, concise and coherent; and recognise this draft decision is an improvement. However, there is a substantial need to develop additional scientific understanding as well as appropriate methodologies to assess GES. Currently, scientific…

Consultation response

Coalition Clean Baltic, 11 Oct 2016

CCB wants to add to previous post since the first message was cut short: more detailed and important comments of individual Descriptors is available here http://www.ccb.se/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/NGO_comments_GES_decision_Oct2016.pdf

Consultation response

Natuurpunt vzw, 11 Oct 2016

We would like to bring to your attention some fundamental improvements that are still needed to ensure that the revised Decision leads to a more effective implementation of the MSFD. We recognise that the proposed draft Decision is an improvement upon Decision 2010/477/EU by providing for a…

Consultation response

OceanCare, 10 Oct 2016

We would like to bring to your attention some fundamental improvements that are still needed to ensure that the revised Decision leads to a more effective implementation of the MSFD. We recognise that the proposed draft Decision is an improvement upon Decision 2010/477/EU by providing for a…

Consultation response

Liga para a Protecção da Natureza, 11 Oct 2016

We would like to bring to your attention some fundamental improvements that are still needed to ensure that the revised Decision leads to a more effective implementation of the MSFD. We recognise that the proposed draft Decision is an improvement upon Decision 2010/477/EU by providing for a…

Consultation response

Marine Conservation Society, 12 Oct 2016

We recognise that the European Commission is attempting to help Member States by providing for a clearer and simpler approach to the determination and assessment of GES under the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive. However, we are concerned that the search for clarity and simplicity involves …

Consultation response

Danish Society for a Living Sea, 10 Oct 2016

We would like to bring to your attention some fundamental improvements that are still needed to ensure that the revised Decision leads to a more effective implementation of the MSFD. We recognise that the proposed draft Decision is an improvement upon Decision 2010/477/EU by providing for a…