OpenLobby.EU
Explore

Commission Regulation on inside information platforms and registered reporting mechanisms under REMIT

Energy

The Commission Delegated Regulation further details the rules for the authorisation and supervision of inside information platforms(IIPs) and registered reporting mechanisms(RRMs) by the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators(ACER) under Regulation (EU)No 1227/2011 of 25/10/2011 on wholesale energy market integrity and transparency(REMIT). Under REMIT market participants are required to report certain information to ACER. IIPs and RRMs are the entities who report the required data to ACER on behalf of market participants

Links

Public consultation

ID: 14448

Lobbying Activity

27 responses

EDF urges clarity on platform rules and MP backup options

ELECTRICITE DE FRANCE, 15 Sept 2025

EDF requests clearer rules on when market participants can use backup publication channels like company websites, better defined validation processes for inside information, and testing requirements that include publication capacity. They argue IIPs should not reject information unless detailed validation rules are specified in the Delegated Act.
This would preserve EDF's ability to disclose market-critical information during platform failures and avoid financial damages from publication delays.
ACER loses proposed supervisory powers over market participants that exceed REMIT's legal mandate.

ENEL SpA Urges Greater Flexibility for Energy Market Reporting

ENEL SpA, 15 Sept 2025

ENEL requests precise deadlines for reporting platforms to provide updated technical specifications to clients. They advocate for validation before publication and seek flexibility to use alternative disclosure channels.
This would reduce compliance burdens by allowing the use of multiple channels for disclosures.
Other market participants lose efficient access to data if publication is fragmented across various channels.

Eni Calls for Extended Timelines and Scope Limits in REMIT Regulation

Eni S.p.A., 16 Sept 2025

Eni requests that conflict-of-interest rules apply only to commercial data platforms, not corporate group entities. They want mandatory deadlines for platforms to share technical specifications with clients. For new reporting requirements, they ask for a minimum 12-month implementation period from entry into force.
This would reduce compliance complexity for their internal reporting systems and provide more time to adapt technical infrastructure.

Oil and Gas Producers Seek 12-Month Implementation Timeline for REMIT Changes

International Association of Oil Gas Producers Europe, 16 Sept 2025

The association requests at least 12 months implementation time for all parties to make necessary changes, test and operationalize new data validation systems. They want commercial platforms to share updated technical specifications with clients on a clear timetable.
This would reduce their risk of improper inside information management and potential insider trading violations.

RWE seeks legal clarity and simplified testing for energy reporting

RWE AG, 15 Sept 2025

RWE requests a legal recital confirming that platform submission satisfies disclosure obligations to avoid fines. They also argue that testing requirements should not apply to established reporting mechanisms.
This would protect the company from regulatory penalties and expedite the approval of existing systems.
National regulatory authorities lose the ability to issue fines for specific market disclosure breaches.

Eurogas urges twelve-month delay for energy reporting standards

EUROGAS, 17 Sept 2025

Eurogas requests that the new reporting table implementation be delayed for twelve months. They also propose limiting conflict of interest requirements to commercial entities.
This extension allows members to avoid immediate technical implementation costs and regulatory scrutiny.
Regulators and traders lose access to reliable data during platform outages.

A2A urges flexible rules and longer timelines for energy reporting

A2A, 12 Sept 2025

A2A argues that conflict rules should only apply to commercial platforms, not internal ones. They request a 12-month period to test new systems before they become mandatory. They also suggest making website publication optional for companies during platform outages.
This would reduce regulatory costs for internal operations and prevent legal risks from errors.
Transparency suffers if market data is scattered across individual websites instead of central platforms.

Intercontinental Exchange Demands Removal of Duplicative Energy Reporting Rules

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., 16 Sept 2025

ICE urges excluding products already reported under financial rules from new energy requirements. They also request extending implementation timelines to at least eighteen months.
This would reduce administrative burdens and technical costs for market infrastructure providers.
Consumers may face higher energy prices if firms pass on increased compliance costs.

Gas Infrastructure Europe Urges Proportionate Reporting and Reduced Burdens

Gas Infrastructure Europe, 15 Sept 2025

The organization requests the removal of duplicate reporting requirements and a simplified authorization process for established platforms. They propose extending the implementation timeline to 18 months to allow for necessary technical adjustments and guidance.
This would lower compliance costs and prevent operational disruptions for non-profit infrastructure operators.
Regulators may lose immediate access to certain detailed data formats, potentially slowing market monitoring.

Enagás urges simplified authorization and longer reporting transition periods

Enagás S.A., 16 Sept 2025

Enagás requests a simplified fast-track authorization and reduced documentation for reporting entities. They also propose extending the provider substitution deadline to three months.
These changes would lower administrative costs and prevent unnecessary operational disruptions.
Energy regulators might have reduced access to detailed corporate group structures.

Energy Traders Europe seeks legal certainty for energy platforms

Stichting European Federation of Energy Traders (We operate under the name Energy Traders Europe), 16 Sept 2025

Energy Traders Europe calls for legal guarantees that submitting data to platforms fulfills disclosure obligations. They advocate for flexible emergency disclosure channels and warning systems for reporting errors. They recommend avoiding mandatory reporting formats that could obstruct automated data processes.
This would provide energy traders with greater legal certainty and lower operational risks.
New market entrants may face a competitive disadvantage if established platforms receive easier approval.

Europex Urges EU to Simplify Rules for Energy Reporting Platforms

Europex - Association of European Energy Exchanges, 12 Sept 2025

The association requests simplified authorisation and a reduction in redundant administrative data submissions. They seek to extend reporting correction deadlines and lower the mandatory system availability targets. They also propose removing complex new data fields like curve types to maintain usability.
A simplified process would prevent redundant data submissions and reduce long-term operational costs.
Regulators would lose access to a centralized register of errors for monitoring market compliance.

EEX urges simpler reporting rules and longer implementation timelines

European Energy Exchange AG, 16 Sept 2025

EEX requests removing the obligation to disclose fee-setting methods to regulators. They oppose mandatory back-up arrangements between platforms and seek longer implementation periods. The exchange also wants to eliminate unnecessary registers for data errors.
This would reduce regulatory costs and protect the commercial flexibility of platforms.
Regulators lose direct access to internal data registers and detailed pricing information.

Consultation response

Open Grid Europe GmbH, 12 Sept 2025

Please find enclosed the response of Open Grid Europe GmbH.

Consultation response

GASCADE Gastransport GmbH, 16 Sept 2025

Thank you for the opportunity to share our view on the draft regulation. Please find our points in the attached file. In addition to this, we would like to highlight the following point: - Article 17, paragraph 3: The concerned RRMs software (a) and hardware and software architecture (b) should be…

Consultation response

GAZ-SYSTEM S.A., 16 Sept 2025

GAZ-SYSTEM is a gas transmission system operator in Poland. The company is also the owner of the LNG Terminal. In addition, the company operates the GSA Platform, which is used for the allocation of capacity on interconnectors and provides secondary market reporting. Consequently, it has been…

Consultation response

Elettricità Futura, 16 Sept 2025

A more detailed feedback is available in the attached document jointly elaborated by EF and Proxigas EF/Proxigas welcome the opportunity to provide feedback on the Draft Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011 (REMIT). Our key observations and recommendations are…

Utilitalia urges specific deadlines for energy reporting platforms

Utilitalia, Imprese Acqua Ambiente Energia, 15 Sept 2025

Utilitalia requests that conflict rules apply only to commercial entities. They seek firm deadlines for technical updates and exclusion of over-the-counter trades from reconciliation.
The proposals would reduce compliance burdens and protect members from potential legal risks.
Regulators would have less oversight of energy trades if reconciliation requirements are narrowed.

Consultation response

ONTRAS Gastransport GmbH, 12 Sept 2025

Please find attached the response of ONTRAS Gastransport GmbH

Consultation response

OMI Polo Español S.A., 16 Sept 2025

Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on this Commissions proposal. Please find attached OMIEs comments to the proposal.

Consultation response

ASOCIACION ESPAÑOLA DEL GAS, 15 Sept 2025

We would like to express our appreciation for the opportunity to provide feedback to European Commission about the proposed new Commission Delegated Regulation Supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011 (REMIT). This response incorporates our observations and suggestions based on the draft…

Consultation response

BULGARTRANSGAZ, 16 Sept 2025

Bulgartransgaz is a Bulgarian gas TSO and SSO, registered as REMIT market participant and RRM since 2015. We welcome the opportunity to contribute to the European Commissions public consultation on the draft Delegated Regulation setting out requirements for RRMs and IIPs. While the Commissions…

Consultation response

Associazione Nazionale Industriali Gas, 16 Sept 2025

Proxigas welcome the opportunity to provide feedback on the Draft Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011 (REMIT). Our key observations and recommendations are as follows: Scope of application: Articles 4(2) and 16 should apply exclusively to commercial IIPs/RRMs,…

Consultation response

Český plynárenský svaz, 15 Sept 2025

Article 3 (Transactions to be reported on a continuous basis) Article 3(b)(i) and (ii) sets that transactions relating to the transportation of natural gas between entry-exit systems in the Union and between entry-exit systems in the Union and transmission systems outside of the Union shall be…

Consultation response

NET4GAS, s.r.o., 15 Sept 2025

Article 3 (Transactions to be reported on a continuous basis) Article 3(b)(i) and (ii) sets that transactions relating to the transportation of natural gas between entry-exit systems in the Union and between entry-exit systems in the Union and transmission systems outside of the Union shall be…

Consultation response

, 12 Sept 2025

Please find attached the response from Thyssengas GmbH

Consultation response

OTE, a.s., 12 Sept 2025

Please find enclosed the response of OTE, a.s., the holder of a license for the activities of the market operator, which includes the electricity and gas market in the Czech Republic.