OpenLobby.EU
Explore

Intel Corporation

Intel is a semiconductor industry leader creating world-changing technology that enables global progress through advanced chip design and manufacturing.

Lobbying Activity

Meeting with Marion Walsmann (Member of the European Parliament)

16 Oct 2025 · Third-party financed patent cases

Meeting with Chiara Galiffa (Cabinet of Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič) and Infineon Technologies AG and

1 Oct 2025 · EU – US relations

Meeting with Angelika Niebler (Member of the European Parliament)

3 Jun 2025 · EU Digital Sovereignty and Competitiveness

Meeting with Tiemo Wölken (Member of the European Parliament)

21 May 2025 · IP Policy (staff level)

Meeting with Alexandra Geese (Member of the European Parliament) and Deutsche Telekom and

29 Apr 2025 · Event: DACH-Tech

Meeting with Nina Carberry (Member of the European Parliament)

22 Apr 2025 · Trade and Energy

Meeting with Reinier Van Lanschot (Member of the European Parliament)

9 Apr 2025 · Introduction meeting with Intel

Meeting with Pierre Chastanet (Head of Unit Communications Networks, Content and Technology)

11 Mar 2025 · Intel state of play on their European and global semiconductor operations and business development

Meeting with Eszter Lakos (Member of the European Parliament)

17 Feb 2025 · Tech & digital policy

Meeting with Niels Flemming Hansen (Member of the European Parliament)

12 Feb 2025 · Intel (Riccardo Masucci & Stéphane du Boispéan) meeting MEP Niels Hansen

Meeting with András Gyürk (Member of the European Parliament)

12 Feb 2025 · Chips and AI

Meeting with Eero Heinäluoma (Member of the European Parliament)

12 Feb 2025 · Current Affairs

Meeting with Seán Kelly (Member of the European Parliament)

11 Feb 2025 · EU digital & industrial policy and competitiveness agenda

Meeting with Paulo Cunha (Member of the European Parliament)

11 Feb 2025 · Digital policies

Meeting with Daniel Attard (Member of the European Parliament)

11 Feb 2025 · Introductory Meeting

Meeting with Matthias Ecke (Member of the European Parliament)

11 Feb 2025 · Industriepolitik | Halbleiter

Meeting with Dan Nica (Member of the European Parliament)

11 Feb 2025 · Exchange of views on EU Chips Act, energy prices, cybersecurity

Meeting with Billy Kelleher (Member of the European Parliament)

11 Feb 2025 · Industrial policy and trade relations

Meeting with Maria Grapini (Member of the European Parliament)

10 Feb 2025 · Achiziții publice, și politici digitale

Meeting with Svenja Hahn (Member of the European Parliament) and BUSINESSEUROPE and

29 Jan 2025 · Renew Europe Stakeholder Roundtable: “Elevator Pitch for Better Single Market Rules”

Meeting with Mariateresa Vivaldini (Member of the European Parliament)

15 Jan 2025 · Meeting conoscitivo

Meeting with Svenja Hahn (Member of the European Parliament)

5 Dec 2024 · European competitiveness and priorities for the new mandate

Meeting with Ilhan Kyuchyuk (Member of the European Parliament)

19 Nov 2024 · General presentation of activities to support the digital transition

Meeting with Marion Walsmann (Member of the European Parliament) and Axel Springer SE

13 Nov 2024 · EU-Digitalisierungspolitik

Meeting with Victor Negrescu (Member of the European Parliament)

8 Nov 2024 · Enforcement of intellectual property rights directive

Meeting with András Gyürk (Member of the European Parliament)

8 Nov 2024 · Digitalisation

Meeting with Dóra Dávid (Member of the European Parliament)

24 Oct 2024 · Legislative priorities for the 10th legislature

Meeting with Barry Andrews (Member of the European Parliament)

23 Oct 2024 · Semiconductors

Meeting with Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur for opinion)

23 Oct 2024 · European Defence Industry Programme

Meeting with Regina Doherty (Member of the European Parliament)

23 Oct 2024 · Chip manufacturing

Meeting with Kosma Złotowski (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur)

22 Oct 2024 · The challenges for the protection of intellectual property rights in the EU

Meeting with Brando Benifei (Member of the European Parliament)

2 Oct 2024 · AI safety across various risk areas, AI Act

Meeting with Mairead McGuinness (Commissioner) and

10 Sept 2024 · High-level executive roundtable: preventing the circumvention of EU sanctions on sensitive goods.

Meeting with Valdis Dombrovskis (Executive Vice-President) and BUSINESSEUROPE and

10 Sept 2024 · Preventing the circumvention of EU sanctions on sensitive goods

Meeting with Margrethe Vestager (Executive Vice-President) and

5 Sept 2024 · Exchange on the semiconductors situation in Europe and matters related to the competition portfolio

Meeting with Margrethe Vestager (Executive Vice-President) and

25 Jul 2024 · Exchange on the semiconductors situation in Europe and matters related to the competition portfolio

Meeting with Margrethe Vestager (Executive Vice-President) and

15 Jul 2024 · Exchange on the semiconductors situation in Europe and matters related to the competition portfolio

Meeting with Maurits-Jan Prinz (Cabinet of Commissioner Thierry Breton)

20 Jun 2024 · intellectual property and standards

Meeting with Anthony Whelan (Cabinet of President Ursula von der Leyen)

20 Jun 2024 · on semiconductors

Meeting with Stina Soewarta (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager), Thomas Woolfson (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager)

20 Jun 2024 · Discussion on semiconductors situation in Europe and matters related to the competition portfolio

Meeting with Margrethe Vestager (Executive Vice-President) and

17 Jun 2024 · Discussion on semiconductors situation in Europe, and matters related to the competition portfolio

Meeting with Michael Hager (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis)

22 Mar 2024 · TTC, transatlantic cooperation on semiconductors and AI

Meeting with Andrus Ansip (Member of the European Parliament)

28 Feb 2024 · Semiconductors

Meeting with Tom Berendsen (Member of the European Parliament)

28 Feb 2024 · Semiconductor manufacturing - policy recommendations

Meeting with Bart Groothuis (Member of the European Parliament)

27 Feb 2024 · SEPs

Meeting with Cristian-Silviu Buşoi (Member of the European Parliament)

27 Feb 2024 · Intel s policy White Paper

Meeting with Damian Boeselager (Member of the European Parliament)

27 Feb 2024 · Labour mobility in the EU

Meeting with Matthias Ecke (Member of the European Parliament)

27 Feb 2024 · Halbleiter / Industriepolitik

Meeting with Andreas Schwab (Member of the European Parliament)

14 Feb 2024 · Patentrecht

Meeting with Iliana Ivanova (Commissioner)

16 Jan 2024 · Working dinner hosted by Intel with the participation of CEOs of

Meeting with Margrethe Vestager (Executive Vice-President)

11 Jan 2024 · Competition and digital issues

Meeting with Silvan Agius (Cabinet of Commissioner Helena Dalli)

8 Nov 2023 · Meeting to talk about Europe’s most recent initiatives for inclusion and equality.

Meeting with Didier Reynders (Commissioner) and

28 Sept 2023 · Discussion of Intel’s investment plans in the EU

Meeting with Elina Melngaile (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis), Zaneta Vegnere (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis) and

5 Jun 2023 · Trade & Technology Council, Global Steel and Aluminum Arrangement, Critical Minerals Agreement

Meeting with Fabrice Comptour (Cabinet of Commissioner Thierry Breton)

12 May 2023 · semiconductors

Meeting with Patricia Reilly (Cabinet of Commissioner Mairead Mcguinness)

2 May 2023 · Planned expansion of Intel's chip manufacturing capacity in Europe

Meeting with Axel Voss (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur) and BUSINESSEUROPE and

8 Mar 2023 · Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence

Meeting with Thierry Breton (Commissioner) and

27 Feb 2023 · Telecoms and semiconductors policy

Meeting with Fabrice Comptour (Cabinet of Commissioner Thierry Breton)

7 Feb 2023 · Chips

Meeting with Axel Voss (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur) and BUSINESSEUROPE and

25 Jan 2023 · Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence

Meeting with Henrike Hahn (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur)

20 Dec 2022 · EU Chips Act

Meeting with Bart Groothuis (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur)

12 Dec 2022 · Chips Act

Meeting with Geert Bourgeois (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur for opinion)

12 Dec 2022 · Chips

Meeting with Thierry Breton (Commissioner) and

10 Nov 2022 · Chips

Meeting with Margrethe Vestager (Executive Vice-President) and

10 Nov 2022 · Competition policies

Meeting with Ursula von der Leyen (President)

10 Nov 2022 · Microchip investments in Europe

Meeting with Roberto Viola (Director-General Communications Networks, Content and Technology)

21 Sept 2022 · Intel in Europe

Meeting with Thierry Breton (Commissioner) and

20 Sept 2022 · Chips

Meeting with Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur for opinion)

14 Sept 2022 · Chips Act

Meeting with Svenja Hahn (Member of the European Parliament)

14 Sept 2022 · EU Chips Act

Meeting with Lina Gálvez (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur)

14 Sept 2022 · European Chips Act

Meeting with Karlo Ressler (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur for opinion)

13 Sept 2022 · Chips Act

Meeting with Paul Tang (Member of the European Parliament) and Google and

18 Jul 2022 · Transatlantic Policy Week: July 18 to July 20

Meeting with Marta Balossino (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager), Michele Piergiovanni (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager)

27 Jun 2022 · Issues within Competition portfolio.

Meeting with Roberto Viola (Director-General Communications Networks, Content and Technology)

27 Jun 2022 · Semiconductor R&D

Meeting with Deirdre Clune (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur for opinion)

21 Jun 2022 · Corporate Sustainibility Due Diligence

Meeting with Miapetra Kumpula-Natri (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur)

31 May 2022 · Chips act

Meeting with Karlo Ressler (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur for opinion) and DIGITALEUROPE and

17 May 2022 · Chips Act

Meeting with Barry Andrews (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur)

17 May 2022 · CSDDD

Meeting with Axel Voss (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur) and American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union and

11 May 2022 · Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence

Intel urges EU to raise automated vehicle registration limits

14 Apr 2022
Topic — The initiative provides technical specifications for the approval of automated and fully automated vehicles.
Message — Intel proposes increasing registration limits for automated vehicles and allowing countries to set higher caps. They also want a firm deadline for standard approval rules.123
Why — Higher caps would allow the company to move beyond experimental trials and achieve commercial scale.4
Read full response

Meeting with Thierry Breton (Commissioner) and

15 Mar 2022 · Micro Chips

Meeting with Sabine Weyand (Director-General Trade)

27 Jan 2022 · Intel's strategy, TTC, GAMs and Export controls.

Meeting with Ursula von der Leyen (President)

27 Jan 2022 · Meeting with CEO of INTEL

Meeting with Roberto Viola (Director-General Communications Networks, Content and Technology)

14 Jan 2022 · Semiconductors

Meeting with Thierry Breton (Commissioner) and

9 Nov 2021 · Semiconductors

Meeting with Fabrice Comptour (Cabinet of Commissioner Thierry Breton)

9 Nov 2021 · Preparation chips act

Meeting with Thierry Breton (Commissioner) and

5 Nov 2021 · Semiconductors and Chips Act

Meeting with Thierry Breton (Commissioner) and

21 Oct 2021 · Cross interview on chips-act

Meeting with Elina Melngaile (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis), Zaneta Vegnere (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis)

16 Sept 2021 · Trade and Technology Council

Meeting with Thierry Breton (Commissioner) and

13 Sept 2021 · European semi conductor strategy

Response to Smartwatches and connected toys

27 Aug 2021

Intel welcomes the opportunity to comment on the draft delegated act under the Radio Equipment Directive (RED). We appreciate the Commission leadership on cybersecurity and understand the draft delegated act is intended to be a pillar of the proposed EU regulatory framework advancing the cybersecurity of products. We emphasize the need to ensure consistency and reduce duplicity across existing and proposed regimes for product cybersecurity, including with respect to the proposed horizontal legislation. The essential requirements set out in Article 3 (3) of the Directive should be addressed in a coherent manner for application when placing radio equipment on the market. Prior to these requirements becoming part of the conformity assessment process, technical standards and Harmonised European Norms (HENs) will have to be developed by the European Standardization Organizations (ESO). To ensure requirements improve cybersecurity and support interoperability, comprehensive consideration of the security requirements by the ESO is needed. This analysis should address, among others, the appropriate security technical requirements needed to address various risk assessments, how those requirements would align with existing (and under development) technical standards and ensure scalable attestation and testability - across the broad scope of products subject to the RED. Ideally, a risk analysis is conducted for each device category independently, which requires time and effort. This analysis to be conducted by the ESOs will be time consuming, especially since multiple relevant HENs are being developed globally or undergoing revisions (ISO/IEC 27402, in development). Crucial work has already started (see : https://portal.etsi.org/webapp/WorkProgram/Report_WorkItem.asp?WKI_ID=63021). The risk analysis must be carried out for all requirements; sufficient time should be granted to ESOs to finalize the analysis. Therefore, the 30 months foreseen in the Article 3 of the draft delegated act appears challenging. Intel suggests, consistent with the views shared by certain ESOs, to allow 24 months for the ESOs to develop the relevant HENs and a transition period of 36 months for the industry to prepare for the new requirements for a total period of 60 months. Furthermore, the definition of HENs for cybersecurity requirements will likely present challenges, arising from different attestation and verification methods for security and privacy, the nature of the requirements (which vary based on the product and risk assessment) as well as the need to foster harmonization on baseline security requirements (based on international technical standards) and support interoperability. HENs need to include suitable, justified technical requirements which support the essential requirements defined in the RED and to develop test cases. This is challenging for two reasons. Such norms traditionally include requirements related to physically observable parameters (out of band radiation, power). Moving from physical requirements to functional requirements in the security/privacy field for industrial certification is a step which will require time for a success implementation. Second, when developing HENs, SDOs may exploit work by other SDOs (ISO/IEC) with respect to requirements definitions. However, available standards typically do not include test definitions in accordance with European Commission requirements. Sufficient time is required to develop these test definitions. While many of these standards are under development/revision, existing security standards vary by sector and product and apply to finished products (ETSI 303-645 , CTA 2088 or ISO/IEC 27402). The Commission may also benefit from further dialogue with the ESOs on challenges associated with this transition and consider if some of these may be addressed by removing certain security / privacy requirements from the draft and addressing them under the contemplated horizontal legislation.
Read full response

Intel urges narrower AI Act scope for tech components

6 Aug 2021
Topic — EU regulation establishing harmonized rules on artificial intelligence systems and safety.
Message — Intel requests removing statistical approaches and search methods from the AI definition, excluding toolkit and library developers from provider obligations, and limiting high-risk classification to systems with clearly safety-related intended uses.123
Why — This would exclude their general-purpose components and tools from provider compliance obligations.45
Impact — Regulators lose broader oversight of AI components that could affect safety systems.6
Read full response

Meeting with Thierry Breton (Commissioner) and

20 Jul 2021 · Processor and semiconductor ecosystem in Europe

Meeting with Margrethe Vestager (Executive Vice-President) and

29 Jun 2021 · EU's digital transition, the processor and semiconductor ecosystem in Europe

Meeting with Thierry Breton (Commissioner) and

29 Jun 2021 · processor and semiconductors

Meeting with Margrethe Vestager (Executive Vice-President) and

30 Apr 2021 · EU's digital transition, the processor and semiconductor ecosystem in Europe

Meeting with Thierry Breton (Commissioner) and

30 Apr 2021 · Processor and semiconductor ecosystem

Meeting with Anthony Whelan (Cabinet of President Ursula von der Leyen)

15 Apr 2021 · Discuss the Commission’s efforts to boost the processor and semiconductor ecosystem in Europe

Meeting with Agnieszka Drzewoska (Cabinet of Commissioner Mairead Mcguinness), Deirdre O’Hea (Cabinet of Commissioner Mairead Mcguinness), Peter Power (Cabinet of Commissioner Mairead Mcguinness)

25 Mar 2021 · Investments, innovation, open strategic autonomy

Meeting with Roberto Viola (Director-General Communications Networks, Content and Technology)

11 Mar 2021 · Videomeeting: Intel plans in Europe & microelectronics (virtual meeting)

Response to Legislative framework for the governance of common European data spaces

29 Jan 2021

The purpose of Chapter II is to provide for re-use of data which is subject to third party rights. In recognition of the fact that this goal involves a delicate balancing act, we offer the following comments in support of clearer protections for those third party rights: IPRs Chapter II applies to data held by a public sector body (PSB) which is protected on grounds of, inter alia, “protection of IPRs of third parties”. The DGA does not affect the IPRs of third parties (Recital 12; Art 5(7)). We believe the intended focus of Art. 4(1) is data re-use downstream of a PSB, but as written, Art. 4(1) could prevent an upstream data licensor to a PSB from controlling re-use of its data. Art. 4(1) prohibits agreements restricting the availability of data (protected by “third party” IPR) for re-use by entities other than the parties to those agreements. In normal commerce, a data licensor will often limit a PSB licensee’s ability to distribute licensed data and may specify downstream distribution terms. If “third party” means any party other than the PSB, such an agreement between a data licensor and a PSB, and a PSB and a downstream user of the licensed data, would be caught by Art 4(1) and prohibited (and Art. 5(7) would not apply), and the data licensor would be deprived of the protection of its IPRs in its data. If “third party” means anyone other than the parties to the agreement restricting re-use, then where a PSB licenses in data on terms which allows it to grant downstream sublicenses which prohibit further disclosure, those downstream sublicenses would seem to be caught by Art. 4(1). We do not believe it is the Commission’s intention to cut across common commercial practice. However, Art. 4 is so widely drafted that we believe it is capable of an interpretation that would prevent licensors to PSBs from controlling re-use of their data by PSB licensees and their downstream sublicensees. This would negatively impact the willingness of business to share data with the public sector. If it is not made clear that licensors to PSBs may control the use of their data by the PSB and its downstream sublicensees, then loss of value in licensed data will be an additional – and for some, prohibitive – cost of doing business with the public sector. Commercial confidentiality The DGA allows commercially confidential data to be re-used if no confidential information is disclosed by re-use, or if the re-use is done in a secure environment, under confidentiality agreement if necessary. It assumes that protection is only necessary where data itself comprises confidential information, or where its re-use will disclose confidential information. This is too narrow a view and fails to consider all the ways in which data may have the quality of commercial confidentiality. Data belonging to a commercial entity and held by a PSB can be commercially confidential for two additional reasons, neither of which are addressed by stripping data of confidential information or requiring it to be used under a non-disclosure agreement: 1) It can represent a significant investment in the collection or generation of the data (in some cases, including intensive investment in the technology that generated the data) 2) It can reveal – on its own or in combination with other information – sensitive information about technology or business models which commercial actors would not make available to competitors even under NDA. Therefore, Art. 4 should not apply where a commercial actor has protected its legitimate business interests in its data by imposing confidentiality obligations on PSBs. In closing, we note that an important factor in the willingness of private sector actors to license their data to PSBs, will be confidence in the ability of those PSBs to identify and take the necessary steps to protect commercially confidential data.
Read full response

Response to Implementing act on a list of High-Value Datasets

24 Aug 2020

Intel welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Commission’s plans towards establishing High Value Datasets (HDVs) in accordance with the Open Data Directive. Intel is one of the world’s largest chipmakers. Intel (through its subsidiary Mobileye) is also the leading supplier of software that enables Advanced Driver Assist Systems (ADAS), with more than 25 automaker partners. Our technology has rapidly evolved to support Autonomous Driving Sensing, Mapping, and Driving Policy. Mobileye has created innovative use cases and markets for its mobility and geospatial data, made possible a result of its significant investments in technology development. As high-quality datasets can facilitate meaningful research and development, public data should be made available in a transparent, standardised, and technology neutral manner. Intel agrees with the Commission that “open re-use of certain categories of public datasets can lead to significant benefits for the society, the environment and the economy”. Intel believes governments should make data collected by public bodies widely available, to leverage the scale and scope of the data in the six categories. The fact that these datasets will have to be compatible with open standard licenses is also a very positive element of the Open Data Directive; this should be taken into consideration when defining the datasets. Article 14 of the Directive requires the Commission to set out a list of HDVs held by public sector bodies and public undertakings, and it is crucial that these are defined such that privately held data which is licensed to public bodies is clearly out of scope. The Directive clearly excludes data for which third parties hold intellectual property rights and data covered by commercial confidentiality. These exceptions to the Directive should be applied expressly and consistently to the definition of HDVs. As the Inception Impact Assessment rightly points out, the HDVs should be both limited and well-defined. Geospatial and Mobility HDVs are a particular area of concern, because Intel understands the degree of investment that goes into creating this type of data and the robust market for it. Semi and fully autonomous vehicles are expected to be deployed on EU roads in the coming years and decades. Companies worldwide are working to develop these new services and the innovative business models through which they will be delivered. This ecosystem is in its infancy, but it is clear that without the capacity to control the data it generates, an innovator is likely to be unwilling or unable to contribute the level of investment necessary to realise the societal benefits of automated driving. Mobility or geospatial data is not just a by-product of technology operation; it results from concerted and significant investment. This data is itself a key input into the operation of an automated driving system, as well as the basis of emerging new business models. In some cases, data formats and containers are proprietary technology. In other cases, access to machine-generated data can give competitors insights into proprietary technology. Therefore, HDVs should not include data generated by private actors as a result of private investment, even where such data is made available by private actors to the public authority, unless the licensor expressly permits the public authority to make it available free of charge to everyone. A contrary result would chill the provision of privately held data to public bodies, which would be antithetical to the Commission’s aims. Intel believes there is great value in governments making the data they hold in these six categories widely available, in accordance with the Directive. However, we urge the Commission to protect legitimate commercial interests in privately held data when drafting the Implementing Act, and so to lay the foundations for a solid and sustainable data economy in the European Union.
Read full response

Meeting with Diana Montero Melis (Cabinet of Commissioner Jutta Urpilainen) and Technology Industries of Finland (Teknologiateollisuus ry)

13 Jul 2020 · European Partnership for Responsible Minerals (EPRM)

Response to Specifications for the provision of cooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITS)

8 Feb 2019

Intel Corporation (“Intel”) welcomes the opportunity to respond in writing to the Public Consultation on the “Specifications for the provision of cooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITS)” Delegated Regulation supplementing the 2010/40/EU ITS Directive. Critical to the EU’s C-ITS competitiveness, 5GAA has urged the Commission not to mandate a specific technology for V2V/V2X in the Delegated Act. China adopted the 3GPP standard for V2V/V2X [1]. The USA is technology neutral [2]; it did not proceed with a proposal to mandate 802.11p for V2V safety [3]. In Europe, the majority of OEMs and cellular industry, support technology neutrality for V2V/V2X in the 5.9 GHz band, and a homogeneous communication system. Cellular-V2X or C-V2X (3GPP standardisation of 4G LTE and 5G) in the 5.9 GHz band offers unique benefits as a single technology platform for vehicle connectivity. It combines direct short-range (not requiring network coverage or subscription) and long-range modes. Consistent with the advocacy of the 100+ member 5G Automotive Association (5GAA) – including the majority of OEMs, cellular industry and tech companies – we have urged the Commission to enable 3GPP in the first instance, on a level playing field with 802.11p, in the 5.9GHz band for V2V safety and V2X. However, the final draft of the C-ITS Delegated Regulation contradicts the Commission’s commitment to an open and future-proof approach to Standards and Legislation, by exclusively embracing ETSI ITS-G5 (a derivate of IEEE 802.11p – based on the Wi-Fi standards developed by IEEE) based communications in the time when the vehicles and other road users are widely communicating via the cellular networks today using the 2G-3G-4G and in the future 5G cellular radio systems standardised by 3GPP; and even worse, it calls for one-way backwards interoperability of LTE-V2X towards ITS-G5. Presently, 5G networks are standardised by 3GPP to fit seamlessly into existing 2G-3G-4G/LTE networks, ensuring a homogeneous radio communication system as technology evolves; the 5G V2V/V2X in the 5.9GHz band will align to this homogeneity. Embracing only ITS-G5 radio access technology in the 5.9 GHz band produces an undue burden to the development of a technologically homogenous safety related radio communication system based on 3GPP standards and hampers the Commission’s objective to lead Europe towards 5G global leadership by 2025. Intel advocates for a forward-looking regulatory framework, which endorses all market-based solutions supporting technical evolution. Most importantly, the future regulatory framework must abide wholly by the principle of technology neutrality to allow such evolution while preventing unfair market distortion and impediment on technological development, thus maximizing C-ITS safety and efficiency for the benefit of EU citizens. Intel therefore recommends the Commission to: • Amend the current draft to include C-V2X technology in its scope via related ETSI ITS approved specifications and profiles on an equal footing with ITS-G5. • Open up participation to the future C-ITS expert group to representatives of technology segments not within the Delegated Act scope today - in the Review of the Clause 33, the Delegated Act refers to an expert group as defined in Article 29(2) namely as representatives from public and private stakeholder groups of the C-ITS network, defined as all operational C-ITS stations in the Union; this can be interpreted as exclusion of industries supporting LTE-V2X. References: [1]. https://www.ericsson.com/en/press-releases/2018/6/ericsson-intel-and-china-mobile-achieve-3gpp-compliant-multi-vendor-standalone-5g-nr-interoperability [2]. https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/7-10-2018-autonomous-vehicle-symposium [3]. https://www.carriermanagement.com/news/2017/09/21/171446.htm
Read full response

Meeting with Vivian Loonela (Cabinet of Vice-President Andrus Ansip)

7 Nov 2018 · Presentation of intel's activities on Cybersecurity and to share views on the future European and global developments

Meeting with Vivian Loonela (Cabinet of Vice-President Andrus Ansip)

25 Jan 2018 · Security research findings

Meeting with James Morrison (Cabinet of Commissioner Julian King)

25 Jan 2018 · Security Research

Meeting with David Boublil (Cabinet of Commissioner Pierre Moscovici), Lucie Mattera (Cabinet of Commissioner Pierre Moscovici) and

23 Jan 2018 · Commission's digital tax proposals: informative exchange of views. Multinationals concerned about impact of change

Meeting with Vivian Loonela (Cabinet of Vice-President Andrus Ansip) and Microsoft Corporation and

7 Dec 2017 · Cybersecurity package

Meeting with Friedrich-Nikolaus von Peter (Cabinet of Commissioner Violeta Bulc) and Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft and

12 Jul 2017 · Standard essential patents

Meeting with Valdis Dombrovskis (Vice-President) and

19 Jun 2017 · economic situation within the EU, investment climate, deepening of the EMU, social dimension of the European project, financial regulations and markets

Meeting with Isabelle Magne (Cabinet of Vice-President Cecilia Malmström)

28 Apr 2017 · conflict minerals

Meeting with Phil Hogan (Commissioner)

16 Feb 2017 · Business matters

Meeting with Günther Oettinger (Commissioner) and IBM Corporation and

1 Jun 2016 · DSM

Meeting with Carlos Moedas (Commissioner)

25 May 2016 · European Open Science Cloud / Open Innovation

Meeting with Günther Oettinger (Commissioner) and Telefonica, S.A. and

22 Feb 2016 · Telco policies

Meeting with Frans Timmermans (First Vice-President)

3 Dec 2015 · Business Europe CEO day

Meeting with Jyrki Katainen (Vice-President) and

3 Dec 2015 · Business Europe CEO day

Meeting with Carlos Moedas (Commissioner) and BUSINESSEUROPE and

3 Dec 2015 · Business Europe CEO day

Meeting with Alexander Italianer (Secretary-General Secretariat-General)

3 Dec 2015 · Business Europe CEO day

Meeting with Günther Oettinger (Commissioner)

30 Nov 2015 · Broadband, 5G

Meeting with Jyrki Katainen (Vice-President) and

17 Nov 2015 · Roll-out of Investment Plan

Meeting with Valdis Dombrovskis (Vice-President) and

11 Dec 2014 · Presentation of the Annual Growth Survey 2015 outlining the main priorities for the jobs and growth agenda /in the context of the flagship conference ‘Reinvigorating the European Economy: Policies to Foster Jobs, Growth and Innovation’.