OpenLobby.EU
Explore

Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V.

Tesla

Tesla designs and manufactures electric vehicles and renewable energy products to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy.

Lobbying Activity

Meeting with Giorgio Gori (Member of the European Parliament) and A2A and

20 Jan 2026 · Automotive package

Meeting with Andreas Glück (Member of the European Parliament)

7 Jan 2026 · Climate and Energy Policy

Response to Roadmap for artificial intelligence and digitalisation for energy (RAID-E)

4 Nov 2025

Tesla is a world leader in battery energy storage systems (battery storage), electric vehicles (EVs) and their charging infrastructure, delivering digital energy solutions at both residential and utility scale. As pioneering manufacturer of advanced, software-based energy technologies, Tesla is driving the way to sustainable abundance. We welcome the Commissions focus on digitalization and AI in energy, a process that can urgently empower software-based energy resources such as large-scale batteries, which are already deployed, scalable, and net-zero. These digital assets not only unlock grid flexibility and provide grid resilience; they also offer fast-track solutions needed to support computational loads, distributed energy resources (DER) and electrification. A new generation of large-scale batteries now operates in grid-forming mode, offering services such as synthetic inertia, voltage control, fast frequency response and black start. These multi-use assets go beyond flexibility: they stabilize both the site and the surrounding grid. While distribution and transmission upgrades often take 814 years, large-scale batteries can be deployed in under 12 months thanks to their mass-produced nature allowing scalability. Software- and firmware-based, they are tunable, an agility that can accelerate the ability to meet ever-evolving grid needs. Yet despite these advantages, utility-scale storage remains underused in Europe due to outdated regulatory frameworks that focus excessively on grid CAPEX. These advanced, software-based technologies provide an immediate alternative to costly grid reinforcements, because grid connection processes and infrastructure upgrades are not scaling fast enough to support an electrified economy, that must now also integrate computational loads. In the attached contribution, we recommend five key policy actions to unleash the full potential of software-based batteries: 1) Modernizing Grid Investment Models through TOTEX Approaches. 2) Include binding Battery Storage Targets in National Energy & Climate Plans (NECS) and/or in Flexibility Action Plans (FAPs). If not, require TSOs to accept all mature storage connection requests, and apply Adequate Battery Storage Criteria in Capacity Markets as next best alternative. 3) Provide Grid Connection Priority for Congestion Relievers along with adequate guidelines on Flexible Connection Agreements and Local Congestion Management Products. 4) Fully permit Continuous Bid Re-optimization. 5) Support Commercially based Demand-Response Interoperability to foster competition and preserve impeccable user experiences (UX). Finally, cybersecurity must be ensured through measures adequately tailored to battery storage specificities. We thank the Commission for opening this important consultation and remain at your disposal to provide technical input and share practical experience.
Read full response

Meeting with Elena Sancho Murillo (Member of the European Parliament) and Telefonica, S.A.

4 Nov 2025 · Relevant Issues to the ITRE Committee

Meeting with Francesco Torselli (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur)

4 Nov 2025 · Incontro conoscitivo

Tesla Urges EU to Prioritize Decentralized Battery-Driven Energy Security

13 Oct 2025
Topic — The EU is revising its energy security framework for a decarbonized, integrated system.
Message — Tesla calls for a shift toward decentralized electricity markets powered by software-driven battery storage. They urge the Commission to create a single market for distributed energy resources and avoid applying gas standards to electricity.123
Why — This would reduce deployment delays and lower market entry costs for battery technologies.45
Impact — Traditional grid operators lose their dominance over stability services provided by expensive infrastructure.678
Read full response

Response to Electrification Action Plan

9 Oct 2025

Tesla is a world leader in battery storage and electric vehicles (EVs) manufacturing, including EV chargers. As a pioneering manufacturer of energy products and provider of grid flexibility services, including demand response, Tesla is driving the transition to sustainable abundance. Europes Electrification Action Plan may be key to the EUs industrial and energy policy, but its also crucial for Europes energy and digital independence (because AI data centers integration into the grid can be supported by utility-scale energy storage). Its important for European citizens that the best technologies for the task at hand are enabled to fulfil their potential, including delivering value to users and consumers. EU action must be guided by evidence-based metrics (value proposition, maturity, scalability, affordability) to ensure optimal deployment pace and to lower consumer cost of electrification. Electrification is accelerating, compounded by the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) data centers. But customers are missing out on lower costs, because connections to the grid and grid enhancements are not scaling fast enough to meet the needs of an electrified system. By contrast, utility-scale storage can be deployed in under 12 months at scale, relieving congestion. This new capacity can in turn accelerate connections for all grid users (not just storage, but also nearby loads, such as charging infrastructure and industrial sites e.g.). It can further deliver grid stability, not just grid flexibility (voltage control, synthetic inertia, fast frequency response, black start, etc.). Grid-Stability 2.0 batteries, like batteries operating in grid-forming mode e.g., can defer or replace expensive and lengthy grid investments, at lower cost for society and faster. As a provider of demand response, and smaller, domestic energy products, we can say that, although all these flexibility solutions have a role to play, the EU needs dedicated action to fully unlock the benefits of utility-scale storage, as outlined in attachment, by contrast to demand response and behind-the-meter distributed energy resources (DER), that are facing different types of challenges, also highlighted in attachement. We therefore urge the Commission to: (1) Prioritize utility-scale battery storage with Adequate Battery Storage Criteria in Capacity Markets and Flexibility Action Plans. (2) Launch a Grid-Stability 2.0 Battery Framework that unleashes the full grid-stability potential of utility-scale battery storage, not just flexibility (synthetic inertia, black-start, etc.). (3) Encourage V2G Scale-up also for V2G Proprietary Solutions, by delivering a more harmonizing Requirements for Generators Network Code 2.0, instead of overfocusing on early-stage EV-EVSE interoperability. (4) Introduce Fit-for-purpose EU Grid Governance for Decentralized Energy, including all distributed energy resources (DER) and EV chargers, by creating a Single Market for DERs. Theres no Single Market for DER; for them, the Single Market stops as soon as it seeks to connect to the grid due to unharmonized grid requirements; and (5) Reframe the EU narrative on Demand Response Interoperability, by supporting Commercial Demand Response Interoperability, rather than plug-and-play interoperability, to protect innovation, user experience (UX) and competition between DER OEMs. Both our grid-scale and domestic customers show enormous willingness and enthusiasm to offer flexibility and for utility-scale storage grid-stability solutions. These new market players are key to unlocking lower costs and quicker energy system resilience for all households in Europe. However, the introduction of tools to genuinely shift demand and integrate more renewables is an enormous shift for many grid operators. This shift must be done to alleviate price pressures. As such, it requires political will as the driving force behind new markets and technologies. Brussels, October 9, 2025.
Read full response

Meeting with Bruno Tobback (Member of the European Parliament)

22 Sept 2025 · Battery storage & grids

Tesla Urges EU to Prioritize Battery Storage and Vehicle Charging

16 Jul 2025
Topic — The package proposes measures to accelerate the upgrade, digitalisation and expansion of European grid infrastructure.
Message — Tesla requests the EU prioritize battery storage and vehicle-to-grid technology to manage grid congestion. They advocate for a single market for flexibility devices to harmonize technical standards across Europe.12
Why — These policies would boost demand for Tesla's electric vehicles and utility-scale battery storage products.34
Impact — Operators of traditional grid assets like synchronous condensers would lose their protected market position.5
Read full response

Response to Targeted technical update of EU rules on measuring instruments

28 Feb 2025

Tesla Europe strongly supports harmonization of requirements for recharging points under the Measuring Instruments Directive (MID). Currently, the lack of unified metering standards across the EU has resulted in inconsistent national laws and market fragmentation, undermining the single market. MID amendments should prioritize eliminating redundant national legislation by establishing clear, EU-wide equivalency criteria. To address this, MID must explicitly define the conditions under which existing national or industry-specific measurement methodologies become obsolete. This would prevent countries from implementing deviations and ensure alignment across all Member States. National rules must be urgently converged with harmonized EU standards to streamline compliance and foster a cohesive market. Our feedback (see attached) elaborates on the need to replace fragmented approaches with a robust MID framework that removes barriers to innovation and competition.
Read full response

Meeting with Anna Panagopoulou (Cabinet of Commissioner Apostolos Tzitzikostas), Simone Ritzek-Seidl (Cabinet of Commissioner Apostolos Tzitzikostas) and

21 Feb 2025 · Exchange of ideas with regard to the automotive dialogue

Response to Implementing Act on non-price criteria in renewable energy auctions

17 Feb 2025

Tesla thanks the European Commission for the draft Regulation on Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA) Non-Price Criteria. This Regulation presents an opportunity for the EU to ensure supply chain robustness for products critical to accelerating the world's transition to sustainable energy, which we fully support, in line with our Mission. That said, the draft Regulation must be improved to enable manufacturers with an international footprint to make informed operational and investment decisions. Efficient and cost-effective production is vital for the large-scale, affordable deployment of innovative, net-zero, technologies, which is a prerequisite for building a green and competitive European net-zero value chain. Clear rules will attract green investments, create jobs, and drive innovation and competitiveness, allowing Europe to keep on leading the global green transition. To achieve this, the draft Regulation must: (1) Provide clear timelines for industrial stakeholders. (2) Ensure consistency in path-dependent Non-Price Criteria, such as Carbon Footprint and Circular Economy Criteria. Net-zero technology manufacturing is capital-intensive: it requires long-term planning due to large upfront investments (CAPEX). CAPEX decisions are based on the expected size of the commercial pipelines, provided by the (regional) commercial teams. The sudden and unpredictable declaration of dependency on one single country by the Commission risks shrinking the (regional) commercial pipeline, if manufacturing falls on the wrong side of it such as when commercial offers are dismissed due to a facilitys location (in China vs. other places of the world). Net-zero manufacturing is path-dependent: early investment and operational decisions shape and constraint future operational choices. For instance, developing the wrong type of product (without sufficient recycled content e.g.) may turn out fatal when the product falls on the wrong side of Carbon Footprint or Lifecycle Criteria such as when commercial offers are penalized due to lack of sufficient recycled content. For these reasons, the lack of clear and consistent timelines and Criteria especially path-dependent Criteria create regulatory uncertainty for globally operating manufacturers. Investment or operational decisions that were once made rationally suddenly become obsolete or suboptimal. This uncertainty negatively impacts investment decisions and operational planning. It makes Europe a less attractive destination to serve, compared to other regions of the world with more predictable frameworks, that can lead to a shift of focus to other markets. Finally, the draft Regulation must ensure that (3) cybersecurity requirements do not hinder the daily operations of net-zero installations. We invite you to read the full memo for detailed amendment proposals to make this Regulation a true ally of green and competitive European net-zero value chains.
Read full response

Meeting with Arthur Corbin (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné) and Volvo Car Corporation AB and E-MOBILITY EUROPE

11 Feb 2025 · Transformation of the automotive sector

Meeting with Edoardo Turano (Head of Unit Climate Action)

4 Feb 2025 · Strategic Dialogue

Tesla urges EU to harmonize EV and energy rules

29 Jan 2025
Topic — The Commission is consulting on strategies to remove regulatory barriers within the single market.
Message — Tesla calls for EU-wide EV eco-scores to prevent national market distortions. They request a European Road Safety Agency and harmonized grid connection rules for energy flexibility.12
Why — Harmonization reduces costs by allowing Tesla to sell mass-produced products without country-specific redesigns.3
Impact — National regulators and grid operators lose control over domestic technical standards and safety protocols.4
Read full response

Tesla Urges EU-Wide Eco-Score for Electric Vehicles

15 Apr 2024
Topic — Evaluation of Directive 1999/94/EC on passenger car fuel and emission labeling.
Message — Tesla proposes a pan-European Eco-Score rating zero-emission vehicles from A to G. They suggest car labelling requirements be integrated into a unified vehicle certificate. They also advocate for mandatory transparent information for online car sales platforms.123
Why — A unified score would lower Tesla's administrative costs and reward its sustainability efforts.45
Impact — Manufacturers of less efficient electric cars lose their generic zero-emission marketing label.6
Read full response

Meeting with Sofja Ribkina (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis), Zaneta Vegnere (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis)

28 Feb 2024 · EU anti-subsidy investigation into battery energy vehicles from China, general overview of trade related policies, Tesla activities and plans.

Meeting with Kurt Vandenberghe (Director-General Climate Action)

27 Feb 2024 · exchange of views

Meeting with Kateřina Konečná (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur)

3 Oct 2023 · Weights and Dimensions Directive

Tesla Urges Clearer Carbon Reporting Rules for Complex Goods

7 Jul 2023
Topic — New reporting obligations for carbon emissions during the CBAM transitional period.
Message — Tesla requests a specific hierarchy for calculating uncertainty in emissions reports. They also want clarification on supply chain reporting for complex items like fasteners.12
Why — This would simplify regulatory compliance and reduce uncertainty for their global operations.3
Impact — Non-EU smelters would be forced to disclose more detailed carbon emission data.4
Read full response

Meeting with Petar Vitanov (Member of the European Parliament)

24 May 2023 · CO2 Standards for new HDV

Meeting with Pierre-Arnaud Proux (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager), Stina Soewarta (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager)

10 Feb 2023 · Inflation reduction act; Important Projects of Common European Interest

Meeting with Peter Van Kemseke (Cabinet of President Ursula von der Leyen)

27 Jan 2023 · sustainability policy in traffic and energy

Meeting with Sergey Lagodinsky (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur for opinion)

11 Jan 2023 · Data Act

Meeting with Ciarán Cuffe (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur)

17 Nov 2022 · EPBD

Meeting with Daniel Mes (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Frans Timmermans)

15 Nov 2022 · Energy shortage

Meeting with Alejandro Cainzos (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager), Pierre-Arnaud Proux (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager), Stina Soewarta (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager)

15 Nov 2022 · presentation of the company; IRA and sustainable energy; IPCEI.

Meeting with Joan Canton (Cabinet of Commissioner Thierry Breton) and BASF SE and

14 Nov 2022 · Preparation of the critical raw materials act

Meeting with Kurt Vandenberghe (Cabinet of President Ursula von der Leyen)

14 Nov 2022 · Implications of the IRA and possible European responses

Meeting with Aleksandra Tomczak (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Frans Timmermans)

24 Oct 2022 · EU policy framework for energy storage

Meeting with Isabel García Muñoz (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur)

3 Oct 2022 · Revision on the directive of Weight and Dimensions

Meeting with Daniel Mes (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Frans Timmermans)

28 Sept 2022 · Battery Storage Policies

Meeting with Joan Canton (Cabinet of Commissioner Thierry Breton), Maurits-Jan Prinz (Cabinet of Commissioner Thierry Breton)

19 Sept 2022 · Data Act, in-vehicle data proposal, batteries

Meeting with Alin Mituța (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur)

6 Sept 2022 · Data Act

Meeting with Dimitri Lorenzani (Cabinet of Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič)

12 May 2022 · Discussion on strategic foresight

Meeting with Thierry Breton (Commissioner) and

9 May 2022 · Tour of Tesla Gigafactory in Austin.

Meeting with Kurt Vandenberghe (Cabinet of President Ursula von der Leyen)

28 Apr 2022 · RePowerEU en andere zaken van gezamenlijk belang zoals Europees industrie- en klimaatbeleid, Fit455 en de upcoming CO2 standards voor trucks

Meeting with Mohammed Chahim (Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur)

10 Mar 2022 · CBAM

Meeting with Ville Niinistö (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur)

16 Feb 2022 · RED, EPBD, data act, afir - staff level

Meeting with Caroline Nagtegaal (Member of the European Parliament, Shadow rapporteur) and Transport and Environment (European Federation for Transport and Environment) and

24 Nov 2021 · AFIR

Response to Revision of Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Directive

18 Nov 2021

Access to an extensive, convenient and reliable fast-charging network is critical for large-scale electric vehicle (EV) adoption. That’s why, since opening our first Superchargers in 2012, we have been committed to rapid expansion of the network. Today, we have more than 30,000 Superchargers (high power chargers) worldwide. With around 8,000 chargers in Europe distributed over some 750 sites, we are the largest operator of high powered chargers (HPC). Access to the Supercharger network is currently limited to our customers. At the time we started construction of the network, Tesla was the only manufacturer producing long-range all-electric vehicles suitable for everyday use and, hence, the only company building a pan-European network to enables use of these vehicles. The fact that AFIR moves from a directive to a regulation means that Europe is on a good track to overcome the currently fragmented rules for deploying and operating charging points, which also results in very different charging experiences across the EU. The primary focus of AFIR should be to make sure EV drivers have the easiest, most seamless experience when charging their vehicles. A regulation will support the deployment of a consistent and user-friendly charging infrastructure for new chargers to be deployed in the future. However, the application of this new regulatory framework on existing, already deployed charging infrastructure is not acceptable. The retroactive effects of the current proposal, in particular the retroactive classification of existing charging assets as “publicly accessible”, are underestimated and go further than the necessity to upgrade existing hardware to meet AFIR requirements. If the current proposal were applied, it might lead to completely opposite effects: the closure of well-functioning charging stations, a loss of investments and investor confidence and, consequently, a deterioration of the end consumer experience. Moreover, the retroactive application of new definitions and requirements breaches fundamental legal principles, such as legal certainty and regulatory stability, legitimate expectations and protection of private property and investments. Retroactive application of the articles and definitions described in the AFIR should be scrapped, to support the goal of accelerated charging infrastructure growth, by avoiding closure of well-functioning stations, avoiding legal disputes, and avoiding diversion of investments away from new infrastructure investment. Tesla is ready to work with all stakeholders involved to ensure that the new regulation reaches the aim of accelerating the roll-out of charging infrastructure and to finding fair and balanced solutions under the fundamental principles of law.
Read full response

Meeting with Mette Dyrskjot (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager)

8 Jul 2021 · Public consultation on CEEAG / Green Deal

Response to Technical requirements and test procedure for approval of intelligent speed assistance (ISA)

28 Apr 2021

Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to provide feedback. Please see that attached document for our submission.
Read full response

Meeting with Elzbieta Lukaniuk (Cabinet of Commissioner Adina Vălean) and Transport and Environment (European Federation for Transport and Environment) and

13 Apr 2021 · Meeting to discuss the state of play of the Eurovignette

Meeting with Daniel Mes (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Frans Timmermans)

17 Feb 2021 · CO2 standards cars

Response to Updating the EU Emissions Trading System

26 Nov 2020

Tesla recommends not to extend the Emissions Trading System to road transport for the following reasons: • The EU CO2 regulations for cars, vans and trucks has proven to be the single most important driver for emission reductions in the transport sector and for accelerating the transition to an electrified fleet in the EU. Tightening and refining these pieces of legislation should be the focus for transport decarbonisation policies. Inclusion of transport in the ETS will inevitably cause policy competition; • Should a pricing system for transport fuels be implemented, the resulting price signal cannot be expected to generate effective incentives for drivers to switch to zero emission vehicles. Europe’s fuel taxes are in excess of EUR 200/tonne CO2 already, without a notable impact on the uptake of EVs. In addition, an EU-imposed, de facto additional fuel tax will cause pressure on national governments to soften its impact on the electorate (i.e. reduce the existing fuel tax by a similar amount), further undermining the already very limited effectiveness of the policy. • If the inclusion of road transport in the ETS is accompanied with taking the transport sector out of the Effort Sharing Regulation, national governments would be exempted from designing and enforcing green transport policies. This would further undermine a fundamental driver for effective climate policy in transport.
Read full response

Response to Revision of the CO2 emission standards for cars and vans

26 Nov 2020

Recommendations for analysis: • Make a trend analysis of the annual rate of improvement required between 2019 and 2030 according to current legislation, including the impact of the ZLEV benchmark on required CO2 cuts and the inclusion of MAC improvements in eco-innovations; • On the basis of that analysis, investigate ways to accelerate the required rate of improvement in these years, including for the early years of 2023-2025; • Notably tighten the 2025 target and make compliance to emission reduction targets annual from 2023 onwards, with a borrowing and banking system. This could achieve real cuts in the medium term without drastically changing compliance requirements in the short term; • Analyse real-world reductions in tailpipe emissions and options to tighten the gap, including elimination of the ZLEV benchmark, transforming it into a ZEV benchmark, and especially transforming it into a ZEV mandate; • Use the UK’s recently stated ambition level, including a phase out of ICE sales by 2030, as a starting point for analysis, and define how the EU can avoid lagging behind. Find additional inspiration from proposals from the ZETA alliance in the US and California’s ZEV mandate; • Investigate moving the current 2030 target forward by 3, 4 or 5 years; • Investigate a complete transition to zero-emission vehicles by 2030; • Investigate how eco-innovations can be designed in a way that zero-emission vehicles are credited in the same way as ICE vehicles if they use the same energy-saving technologies. If that turns out impossible, consider lowering the eco-innovation cap from 7 g/km to 0 in order to safeguard equal treatment; • Investigate how efforts of Member states who are more ambitious than the EU can be rewarded by additional EU-level emissions cuts; taking inspiration from Article 12.4 of the ETS directive; • Investigate the functioning of the pooling system and options to improve its functioning and/or reform it, to further enhance efficiency and open competition; • Analyse closely the development of battery production capacity in Europe planned for 2025-2030, comparing the very latest announcements with the status 1 and 2 years ago. Investigate how the rapid increase of planned capacity is likely to evolve over time; • Do not analyse options to credit fuel-related measures in vehicle CO2 standards since there is no objective baseline to define ‘additionality’ of fuel related measures compared with RED2. Definition of an objective baseline has been the central challenge with baseline-and-credit related policies from their very inception (e.g. CDM, offsets in Corsia, etc) and no satisfactory resolution has been found to this date.
Read full response

Meeting with Daniel Mes (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Frans Timmermans), Sarah Nelen (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Frans Timmermans)

3 Nov 2020 · Sustainable batteries

Meeting with Daniel Mes (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Frans Timmermans)

9 Apr 2020 · Economic situation in the automotive sector

Meeting with Daniel Mes (Cabinet of Executive Vice-President Frans Timmermans)

7 Feb 2020 · Green Deal and car industry

Meeting with Juraj Nociar (Cabinet of Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič)

9 Dec 2019 · Tesla EU Factories

Meeting with Mauro Raffaele Petriccione (Director-General Climate Action)

9 Jul 2019 · Presentation in brief recent and expected developments relevant for the decarbonisation of the road transport sector

Meeting with Kaius Kristian Hedberg (Cabinet of Commissioner Elżbieta Bieńkowska)

7 Dec 2018 · sustainable transport/enrgy, automated driving, batteries

Meeting with Dominique Ristori (Director-General Energy)

23 Nov 2018 · trends and potential of e-mobility and the key role of batteries and storage technologies

Meeting with Ivo Schmidt (Cabinet of Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič)

15 Dec 2017 · mobility policy, trucks

Meeting with Silvia Bartolini (Cabinet of Vice-President Miguel Arias Cañete)

15 Dec 2017 · Trucks

Meeting with Kaius Kristian Hedberg (Cabinet of Commissioner Elżbieta Bieńkowska)

3 Nov 2017 · Future of automotive industry

Meeting with Henrik Hololei (Director-General Mobility and Transport)

25 Oct 2017 · 2nd Mobility Package

Meeting with Christian Linder (Cabinet of Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič)

13 Jul 2017 · Electromobility in the U.S. and the E.U.

Meeting with Silvia Bartolini (Cabinet of Vice-President Miguel Arias Cañete)

13 Jul 2017 · Electrification of transport California experience

Meeting with Jyrki Katainen (Vice-President) and

3 Jul 2017 · e-mobility

Meeting with Silvia Bartolini (Cabinet of Vice-President Miguel Arias Cañete)

3 Jul 2017 · Alternative Fuels Hydrogen Structure, Post-2020, cars/vans

Meeting with Maroš Šefčovič (Vice-President) and

3 Jul 2017 · Mobility package

Meeting with Silvia Bartolini (Cabinet of Vice-President Miguel Arias Cañete)

7 Apr 2017 · Electromobility platform

Meeting with Silvia Bartolini (Cabinet of Vice-President Miguel Arias Cañete)

14 Nov 2016 · energy efficiency, winter package

Meeting with Elżbieta Bieńkowska (Commissioner) and

21 Sept 2016 · innovation, start-ups, driverless cars

Meeting with Maroš Šefčovič (Vice-President)

2 Jun 2016 · Decarbonisation of transport

Meeting with Violeta Bulc (Commissioner) and

24 Sept 2015 · Commissioner Bulc meeting Tesla Representatives

Meeting with Frans Timmermans (First Vice-President)

24 Sept 2015 · Clean cars

Meeting with Matej Zakonjsek (Cabinet of Commissioner Violeta Bulc)

3 Sept 2015 · decarbonisation

Meeting with Dominique Ristori (Director-General Energy)

3 Sept 2015 · European energy policies

Meeting with Maria Cristina Lobillo Borrero (Cabinet of Vice-President Miguel Arias Cañete), Silvia Bartolini (Cabinet of Vice-President Miguel Arias Cañete)

2 Sept 2015 · Decarbonisation of transport