OpenLobby.EU
Explore

Union-wide performance targets for the fourth reference period (RP4)

Transport

The Single European Sky performance and charging scheme enhances the performance of air navigation services through a gate-to-gate approach covering both en route and terminal services. The fourth reference period (RP4) of the performance and charging scheme will cover calendar years 2025-2029. This Commission Implementing Decision is necessary for setting the Union-wide performance targets for RP4.

Links

Public consultation

ID: 13941

Lobbying Activity

14 responses

Consultation response

European Transport Workers' Federation, 19 Apr 2024

ETF reply to consultation on the draft implementing decision setting Union-wide performance targets for the ATM network for RP4 General comments The European Transport workers Federation regrets the absence of update of the indicators used for the measurement of the performance of Air Navigation…

Consultation response

Airlines for Europe, 19 Apr 2024

A4E finds that the level of ambition of the targets proposed leaves room for improvement. The suggested EU-wide targets stay behind the level of ambitions the previous initial target ranges. In past target setting processes we had to experience that during the examination procedure by member states…

Consultation response

Lufthansa Group, 18 Apr 2024

Lufthansa Group is Europes biggest airline group transporting over 122 million passengers in 2023. Being one of the biggest payers for air traffic control charges in the Eurocontrol area, we have a high interest and depend on ambitious target that ensure that the services are provided in the most…

Consultation response

International Air Transport Association, 19 Apr 2024

IATA must express its disappointment with the level of ambition of the targets proposed. For both the operational KPAs we observe that the targets are worse than the previously consulted initial target ranges, proposed in 2023, even before the examination procedure by member states, where they are…

Consultation response

CANSO - Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation, 19 Apr 2024

CANSO members appreciate that PRB has made some improvements to its applied methodologies in comparison to the targets ranges proposals. These go in the right direction, but CANSO members are concerned that the EU target proposals are still not realistic or achievable. Safety The new EoSM…

Consultation response

DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH, 19 Apr 2024

There are two important updates proposed by the PRB as a result from the autumn consultation on the EU target range proposals, which DFS welcomes as a development into the right direction: The adjustments to the autumn target range proposals in the key areas of environment and capaci-ty leading to…

Consultation response

Air Traffic Controllers European Unions Coordination, 19 Apr 2024

RP4: ATCEUC AND ETF CALL TO REJECT EUROPEAN COMMISSION PROPOSAL OF CUTTING INVESTMENTS IN THE HUMAN AND SYSTEMS OF THE ATM/ANS SECTOR. The third reference period for managing performance of the ATM/ANS service provision (RP3) is now in its last year. This period has been marked by COVID-19 and the…

Consultation response

Società italiana per l'assistenza al volo, 19 Apr 2024

Last autumn, ENAV also submitted its response to the target ranges consultation. When considering the latest proposal for EU-wide targets for RP4, while welcoming the updates and changes to reflect some of the Member States and Operational Stakeholders comments, there are still some assumptions…

Consultation response

ENAIRE, 19 Apr 2024

1.General Comments Some assumptions, methodologies and proposed values cannot be supported by ENAIRE, especially in the areas of Environment, Capacity and Cost-Efficiency. Volatility will have a very significant impact, not addressed in the PRB Advice. Traffic growth at regional level in States as…

Consultation response

Austro Control Österreichische Gesellschaft für Zivilluftfahrt mit beschränkter Haftung, 16 Apr 2024

Austro Control's remarks regarding the different Key Performance Areas: SAFETY: No remarks; ENVIRONMENT: - KEA is not an appropriate ENV indicator; As the impact of adverse weather conditions is not taken into account, it is impossible for AT to reach the targets. Reroutings due to airspace closers…

Consultation response

skeyes, 19 Apr 2024

Skeyes would like to express its concerns in relation to the unrealistic level of ambition of the proposed EU wide targets for RP4. While acknowledging that the PRB has adapted its approach since the target ranges consultation held las autumn in a way that addresses some of our comments and…

Consultation response

Bundesverband der Deutschen Fluggesellschaften e.V., 19 Apr 2024

The Association of German Airlines (Bundesverband der Deutschen Fluggesellschaften e.V. BDF) would like to express its appreciation for the opportunity to comment on the proposal to set Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network for the fourth reference period. We…

Consultation response

Navegação Aérea de Portugal E.P.E, 19 Apr 2024

NAV Portugal would like to thank the opportunity to comment on this process. We believe that a constructive dialogue is essential for the successful implementation of these RP4 targets. We would also like to mention CANSO's position, as it fully reflects NAV Portugal's position on this issue. Our…

Consultation response

Air Navigation Services of the Czech Republic, 19 Apr 2024

ANS CR's comments on EU-wide performance targets by Key Performance Areas: SAF We have no comment on the SAF key performance area. ENV KEA is not an appropriate ENV indicator for ANSPs as the value of KEA is mainly influenced by the choice of route by individual aircraft operators (they often…