OpenLobby.EU
Explore

Evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation

Single market

The purpose of the present evaluation is to assess if the Cosmetic Products Regulation is still fit for its purpose in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and EU added value.

Links

Public consultation

ID: 14433

Lobbying Activity

39 responses

Consultation response

European Environmental Bureau, 21 Mar 2025

The European Environmental Bureau, supported by the Zero Mercury Working Group, appreciates the opportunity to provide evidence on the evaluation of the Cosmetics Products Regulation (CPR). The CPR has played a crucial role in ensuring a high level of consumer safety, notably by keeping the most…

Consultation response

Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs, 21 Mar 2025

The Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) plays a vital role in protecting consumer health and interests. Still, the CPR suffers from major shortcomings, as documented e.g. by the fitness check on endocrine disruptors. Therefore, BEUC strongly regrets that the European Commission has yet to present a…

Chemical industry urges proportionate titanium dioxide cosmetics regulation

European Chemical Industry Council, 21 Mar 2025

The association requests that safety assessments and regulatory entries remain proportionate, using existing safety data and read-across approaches. They argue regulations should not create unnecessary testing requirements that act as barriers to innovation.
This would reduce their testing costs and maintain market flexibility for titanium dioxide products.
Consumer safety advocates lose more rigorous testing standards for cosmetic ingredients.

Consultation response

EuroCommerce, 21 Mar 2025

Effectiveness In general, the Cosmetics Products Regulation (CPR) provides a solid framework for ensuring consumer safety, which is of the utmost priority. Nonetheless, the absence of clearly defined safe threshold limits for such restricted substances may present challenges in ensuring safety and…

Consultation response

Unilever, 21 Mar 2025

Unilever believes that every product we make must be safe for people and for our planet and welcomes the Commissions initiative to evaluate the Cosmetic Product Regulation (CPR). CPR is a consumer-oriented legislation that is fit for purpose and effective. It has positively served the needs of…

Consultation response

L'Oréal, 21 Mar 2025

Please find L'Oreal's contribution in the attached file

Consultation response

Cosmetics Europe, 21 Mar 2025

Cosmetics Europe welcomes the evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) and looks forward to contributing to the process to ensure the European cosmetics and personal care industry can remain competitive, innovative, sustainable and a pillar of European excellence. The CPR has…

Consultation response

European Federation of Essential Oils, 20 Mar 2025

Introduction The European Federation of Essential Oils (EFEO) expresses its gratitude to the European Commission for the opportunity to contribute to the initial evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009. General Comments EFEO reaffirms that the CPR has proven to be a…

IFRA defends risk-based safety assessments for fragrance ingredients

International Fragrance Association, 20 Mar 2025

The organization emphasizes the crucial role of the CPR's scientifically risk-based approach. They request solutions to decouple hazard classifications from automatic bans without initiating a new legislative revision.
Fragrance companies would avoid massive reformulation costs and protect their existing product portfolios.
The bioeconomy and natural ingredient suppliers suffer from regulatory uncertainty and discouraged use.

Consultation response

Cruelty Free Europe, 21 Mar 2025

Revision of the CPR could simplify the implementation of EU legislation applicable to chemicals. The Call for Evidence asks whether the CPR is internally consistent and whether it aligns with other chemicals legislation. The answer, certainly in relation to alignment of animal testing provisions,…

Consultation response

Hospodářská komora České republiky, 21 Mar 2025

Připomínky HK ČR naleznete v příloze.

German animal welfare group calls for end to testing loopholes

Deutscher Tierschutzbund - German Animal Welfare Federation, 21 Mar 2025

The organization demands the removal of loopholes allowing animal testing for ingredients under environmental or worker safety regulations. They state that if safety cannot be proven without animals, the ingredient should not be marketed.
Closing these gaps ensures the organization achieves its goal of a genuine cruelty-free market.
Chemical manufacturers face market restrictions for ingredients that lack non-animal safety data.

Consultation response

Industrieverband Körperpflege- und Waschmittel e.V., 21 Mar 2025

IKW statement on the revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) The German Cosmetic, Toiletry, Perfumery and Detergent Association (IKW) represents companies that manufacture or distribute beauty care products in Germany. IKW has over 440 member companies with a total annual turnover of…

Consultation response

Polish Association of Cosmetic and Detergent Industry / Polskie Stowarzyszenie Przemysłu Kosmetycznego i Detergentowego, 20 Mar 2025

The Polish Association of Cosmetic and Detergent Industry (PACDI) welcomes the call for evidence on the evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR). Please see our comments in the attached file.

Consultation response

Child Rights International Network, 20 Mar 2025

The Child Rights International Network (CRIN) is grateful for this opportunity to take stock of the efficiency - and deficiencies - of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR). This summary reflects our inputs available in the attached document, with references to scientific studies and human rights…

Consultation response

Djurens Rätt, 20 Mar 2025

Översynen av förordningen om kosmetiska produkter utgör en viktig möjlighet att anpassa förordningen utifrån medborgarnas förväntningar och med hänsyn till de framsteg som gjorts inom forskning och utveckling sedan förordningen trädde i kraft. Översynen behöver återspegla kraven i…

Consultation response

THE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES INC., 21 Mar 2025

Please see attched The Estee lauder Companies' response to the Commission call for evidence.

Consultation response

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Foundation, 21 Mar 2025

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals UK (PETA) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the evaluation of the Cosmetics Products Regulation (CPR). As an Internal Market measure, the CPR is intended to harmonise the free movement of goods and protect human health by ensuring that products…

Consultation response

ASOCIACION NACIONAL DE PERFUMERIA Y COSMETICA, 21 Mar 2025

Stanpa, representing over 300 cosmetics companies in Spain, supports the European Commissions initiative to evaluate the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR). This regulation has ensured consumer safety, promoted innovation, and maintained the competitiveness of the European market. Strengths of the…

Consultation response

The European Federation for Cosmetic Ingredients AISBL, 21 Mar 2025

EFfCI is the European Federation for Cosmetic Ingredients, a trade association representing European manufacturers of synthetic and natural ingredients for the cosmetics and personal care industry. Our membership comprises large multinational organizations and SME EFfCI welcomes the opportunity to…

Consultation response

Industrie- und Handelskammer für München und Oberbayern, 21 Mar 2025

We welcome the European Commission's efforts to evaluate the legal requirements for cosmetics for modern, business-oriented and consumer-oriented development. We appreciate the opportunity to comment and would like to make the following statement: We recognize the need for regulatory requirements…

Consultation response

Comité Interprofessionel des Huiles Essentielles Françaises, 21 Mar 2025

Please find attached the response of CIHEF (Interprofessionnal Committee for French Essential Oils) and PPAM de France to the call for evidence.

Consultation response

COSMED, 21 Mar 2025

Since its application in 2013, the CPR has continuously demonstrated its performance in achieving those 2 objectives and CPR is still considered as the global standard for international cosmetic regulations. We emphasize that CPR is the only regulation requiring a safety assessment of every product…

Consultation response

European Association of Chemical Distributors, 20 Mar 2025

Fecc acknowledges the consultation on the evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) and welcomes the opportunity to provide input. As the leading voice for the European chemical distribution sector, we represent companies that play a vital role in the supply chain of cosmetic…

Consultation response

European Coalition to End Animal Experiments, 21 Mar 2025

The CPR has not delivered on its objective to end the testing of cosmetics products and ingredients on animals for two reasons: 1. Despite repeated pleas from animal protection organisations since the inception of REACH in 2001 to ensure that there is coherence between the CPR and REACH with…

Consultation response

Kosmetiikka- ja hygieniateollisuus ry (The Finnish Cosmetic and Hygiene Industry Association), 21 Mar 2025

The Finnish Cosmetic and Hygiene industry Association is an industry association representing both domestic and multinational cosmetics companies of all sizes in Finland. The association is a member of Cosmetics Europe. European citizens including Finnish people use cosmetics, such as body lotions,…

Consultation response

U.Di.Con. APS Unione per la Difesa dei Consumatori, 20 Mar 2025

Il contributo sul regolamento sui prodotti cosmetici offre una serie di spunti rilevanti per migliorare la sicurezza e la trasparenza del settore. Uno dei punti più significativi riguarda la visibilità del PAO (Period After Opening) sulle confezioni. La proposta di integrare questa informazione con…

Consultation response

Movimento Difesa del Cittadino, 19 Mar 2025

Il Movimento Difesa del Cittadino (MDC) accoglie positivamente la valutazione del Regolamento sui prodotti cosmetici (RPC) promossa dalla Commissione Europea, sottolineando l'importanza di aggiornare il quadro normativo per affrontare le nuove sfide poste dalle transizioni verde e digitale. Nel…

Consultation response

The International Natural and Organic Cosmetic Association, 21 Mar 2025

NATRUE, the International Natural and Organic Cosmetic Association, represents pioneering producers from natural and organic cosmetics sector globally and welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the evaluation of the EU Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR). Upholding a strong science-based, risk…

Consultation response

International Collaboration on Cosmetics Safety, 21 Mar 2025

The International Collaboration on Cosmetics Safety (ICCS) welcomes the evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) and look forward to contributing further to the upcoming public consultation. Please see the attachment for details.

Consultation response

Detic asbl / vzw, 21 Mar 2025

Detic is the Belgian and Luxembourg association for producers and distributors of cosmetics, cleaning and maintenance products, adhesives, sealants, biocides and aerosols. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Call for Evidence. Detic is member of Cosmetics Europe (CE). We agree and…

Consultation response

The Cosmetic, Toiletry and Perfumery Association, 21 Mar 2025

Preserving Success While Embracing Improvements. The EU Cosmetic Products Regulation (EU CPR) is widely regarded as the global gold standard for cosmetic product safety, ensuring consumer protection while allowing industry innovation. CTPA strongly supports maintaining its science and risk -based…

Consultation response

European Cosmetics Responsible Person Association, 21 Mar 2025

ERPA supports the Cosmetics Product Regulation (CPR) effectiveness as being a global standard to promote the safety of cosmetics. In light of the exercise on evaluating CPR possible improvements, ERPA calls for clearer guidelines on the responsibilities of the Responsible Person (RP) and the…

Consultation response

Branchenverband Cannabiswirtschaft, 21 Mar 2025

Der Branchenverband Cannabiswirtschaft e.V. (BvCW) vertritt rund 100 Unternehmen aus der Cannabisbranche, darunter viele Akteure der CBD-Kosmetikindustrie. Im Rahmen der Evaluierung der EU-Verordnung über kosmetische Mittel sieht der BvCW Handlungsbedarf, um regulatorische Unsicherheiten zu…

Consultation response

Personal Care Products Council, 21 Mar 2025

Please see attached submission from the U.S. Personal Care Products Council.

Consultation response

The International Federation of Essential Oils and Aroma Trades Ltd, 21 Mar 2025

Dear Sir/Madam, Please find attached the contribution of The International Federation of Essential Oils and Aroma Trades (IFEAT).

Consultation response

Danish Association of Cosmetics and Detergents, 21 Mar 2025

The association's detailed position is attached. This is an executive summary of our position. The Danish Association of Cosmetics and Detergents welcomes the opportunity to comment on the call for evidence for the evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation, which is of great interest to our…

Consultation response

International cosmetic and device association eV, 21 Mar 2025

ICADA e.V. represents small and medium-sized companies in the German-speaking cosmetics industry. The EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 in its current form represents a successful, harmonized legislation at the EU level but here are some points showing room for improvement. The definition of…

Consultation response

european consensus-platform for alternatives, 15 Mar 2025

This submission addresses key considerations for the evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR), focusing on its effectiveness, relevance, coherence, and EU added value. The revision presents a crucial opportunity to align the regulation with scientific advancements, public expectations,…